Godot Bans AI Code, Anthropic Faces Export Controls, and the Open-Source Wars Intensify
Overview
Today's AI conversation is dominated by three major themes: the Godot game engine's historic decision to reject AI-authored code contributions, the escalating regulatory battles around Anthropic's Fable and Mythos models, and the fierce open-source vs. closed-model debate sparked by Dario Amodei's latest statements. Meanwhile, Chinese delivery bots, Meta's secret Gemini dependency, and the release of Claude Sonnet 5 round out a packed day.
Hacker News Stories
Godot will no longer accept AI-authored code contributions
515 points · 365 comments · by pjmlp
The Godot Engine Foundation has announced it will no longer accept code contributions authored by AI, citing concerns that contributors who rely heavily on AI tools may not sufficiently understand the code they submit to maintain or fix it. The policy also rejects AI-generated text in human-to-human communications, though machine translations of human-authored text remain acceptable. The Foundation says contributors should only use AI for 'menial things' and must disclose its use.
Interesting Points
- The policy rejects AI-generated text in human-to-human communications as 'a basic principle of respect'
- Machine translations are still acceptable if the original text was human-authored
- Contributors should only use AI for 'menial things'
- The Foundation believes heavy AI users may not understand their code enough to fix it later
Top Comment Threads
- TomasBM (17 replies) -- Compares verbose AI-authored PRs to a denial-of-service attack on the human mind. Predicts two outcomes: either submitters will add stylistic markers to make AI output seem human, or they'll provide more concise, to-the-point commits. Notes that AI-generated spam is a negative for both humans and AIs, but humans suffer more.
- ThePhysicist (11 replies) -- Points out the contradiction between AI provider valuations (based on the assumption all code will be AI-written) and open-source projects fighting to keep AI contributions out. Shares personal experience of 'AI hangover' — feeling powerful while using AI tools but later finding subtle cracks and inconsistencies in the generated code. Plans to use AI less for feature development and more for planning and debugging.
- d1sxeyes (1 replies) -- Explains that AI breaks the self-selection mechanism of OSS contributions. Traditionally, creating a PR meant you were invested in the project. AI unlocks contributions from people who don't care about the project at all, creating a flood of low-value PRs that overwhelm maintainers.
- clktmr (1 replies) -- Quotes Linus Torvalds: 'the reason C++ is not allowed in the kernel is to keep the C++ people out.' Suggests the AI ban is similarly about managing community dynamics, not just code quality.
- maiybe (9 replies) -- Predicts this will be the slow decline of Godot, arguing that competitors embracing AI-assisted coding could match Godot's feature set in 3-5 years. Notes that making game engines has never been easier, and a well-funded startup with AI integration could reach Godot parity quickly.
How employment changes when firms adopt generative AI
51 points · 42 comments · by nreece
A new study from Ramp and the Economics Lab examines how firms that adopt generative AI change their employment patterns. The research finds that companies increasing headcount are also being pumped full of capital, suggesting the job growth may be tied to AI-fueled investment rather than pure productivity gains. The study notes that while AI adoption correlates with some hiring increases, the effect is modest and heavily influenced by the broader investment environment.
Interesting Points
- Companies adopting AI show about 10% more headcount growth than control groups
- The hiring increases coincide with significant capital inflows to AI-adopting firms
- The effect is modest and may reflect investment-driven growth rather than pure productivity
- The study acknowledges insufficient data for definitive conclusions since ChatGPT launched only in 2022
Top Comment Threads
- Eufrat (2 replies) -- Questions the value of the study given that ChatGPT was released in 2022, noting there isn't enough data for meaningful extrapolation yet.
- shevy-java (1 replies) -- Expresses confusion about the narrative: if more AI leads to more jobs, wasn't the original claim that AI kills all jobs? Calls for a thorough 5-year analysis across countries.
- whatever1 (1 replies) -- Suggests the hiring is because people are wasting time and tokens on irrelevant activities — building unnecessary React UIs for spreadsheets. Compares it to how web frameworks led to more devs-per-project due to 'bullshit work growing to accommodate productivity gains.'
Scammers Sell Seeds for Exotic AI-Generated Flowers That Don't Exist
50 points · 34 comments · by Brajeshwar
Scammers are using AI-generated images to sell seeds for plants that don't exist, with spectacular technicolor leaves that bloom in shapes of birds, butterflies, and cat heads. While fake seed scams predate AI image generators, the ease of creating these images has made the problem far more widespread on platforms like eBay, Amazon, and Etsy, which are unable to keep up with the flood of scam plant sellers.
Interesting Points
- The scam involves selling seeds for plants that physically cannot exist
- AI image generators have made the scam more widespread and harder to detect
- Major platforms eBay, Amazon, and Etsy are unable to stop the flood of scam listings
- The fake seeds are from a brand called 'SheilaDegisn'
Top Comment Threads
- gdulli (3 replies) -- Argues that AI will simply be used more for scam and deception than positive uses, noting that political campaigns will be flooded with fake videos and misinformation.
- jdw64 (2 replies) -- As a freelancer, reports getting many requests to create fake AI-manipulated images for scams, especially fake IDs. Calls for AI watermarks on image generation models but acknowledges this would kill the business viability of those models.
- esafak (2 replies) -- Suggests that image generators should embed their prompts and that platforms like eBay should run slop detectors to identify AI-generated scam content.
America can switch off AI. Europe must switch gears before it's too late
43 points · 55 comments · by TMWNN
An op-ed arguing that while America can afford to slow down on AI development, Europe must accelerate its efforts before it falls irreversibly behind. The piece highlights Europe's structural disadvantages: no major AI companies like Anthropic or OpenAI, fragmented markets across languages and regulations, lack of venture capital concentration, and energy constraints. It warns that Europe's regulatory approach, while well-intentioned, is pushing talent and investment to North America and China.
Interesting Points
- Europe lacks any 'big names' like Anthropic or OpenAI
- The EU's structural design spreads wealth among member nations, making capital concentration for startups nearly impossible
- China is allocating $295 billion for an AI buildout while the US invests heavily too
- EU states have missed out on the Dotcom, Social Media, Cloud, IoT, EV, and GreenTech booms
Top Comment Threads
- schmuhblaster (6 replies) -- As a European, expresses pessimism about meaningful AI change in Europe within the next decade, citing risk aversion and regulatory barriers. Notes that only massive threats like the Ukraine crisis have ever forced Europeans to reconsider fundamental beliefs.
- antiloper (3 replies) -- Delivers a blunt assessment: 'Europe has no chips, no energy, no venture capital, and no training data. It is in fact too late.'
- inglor_cz (0 replies) -- Argues that technological progress doesn't depend on average people but on young innovators who are pushed out of Europe by regulatory burdens. Notes the irony that everyone agrees Europe is overregulated, but everyone also defends their own pet regulation.
AI Zillionaires Are Starting to Get Scared as the Public Turns Against Them
35 points · 15 comments · by pseudolus
A growing number of AI industry billionaires, including Mark Cuban, are expressing concern as public sentiment turns against the AI industry. The article explores how the very wealth transfer dynamics that AI enables — moving wealth from employees to AI vendors — are becoming politically unsustainable as workers and consumers push back against the concentration of power and wealth.
Interesting Points
- AI is described as a mechanism to transfer wealth from employees to AI vendors
- Employees are slowly catching on to the wealth transfer scheme
- AI doesn't buy the products it produces, creating a demand problem
- The article frames AI as 'capitalism gone wild'
Top Comment Threads
- jqpabc123 (2 replies) -- Frames AI as wealth transfer from employees to vendors, noting two problems: employees are catching on, and AI doesn't buy products. Calls the antidote 'socialism — the forced sharing of the wealth that AI is intended to accumulate and concentrate.'
- cyanydeez (1 replies) -- Skepticism about whether only '5 people' are amassing this much power that they're scared. Compares the situation to how banks can loan billions without similar concern.
- wturner (0 replies) -- Argues that the extreme rich have a near monopoly on incentives that create government policy. Says they're above the law and using whatever means the public has to impose consequences is all that's left.
Are readers generating fiction with AI models?
32 points · 48 comments · by ilamont
A new arXiv paper by Gupta, Antoniak, and Walsh analyzes over 500,000 anonymized ChatGPT conversations to study how readers use AI to generate fiction. They find that more than one-third of conversations involve some form of fiction generation, including original stories, roleplay, fanfiction, and erotica. The research identifies 'infinite story demanders' who repeatedly request and revise variations of the same narratives. Users gravitate toward generic forms, repetition, immediacy, and niche combinations, raising questions about a new 'solipsistic reader-writer' who generates and consumes fiction in a closed loop with a machine.
Interesting Points
- More than one-third of ChatGPT conversations involve some form of fiction generation
- Users especially gravitate toward fanfiction and erotica
- The study identifies 'infinite story demanders' who repeatedly request variations of the same narratives
- The research proposes the concept of a 'solipsistic reader-writer' who interacts with fiction in a closed loop with a machine rather than a human other
Top Comment Threads
- sriramgopalan (5 replies) -- Draws parallels to how the internet democratized news (blogging) and television (YouTube), suggesting books and fiction are headed in the same direction with AI.
- idle_zealot (1 replies) -- Argues this is different from web fiction because books already had low distribution barriers. Describes AI-generated fiction as more like a sandbox game or a child playing pretend alone — a distinct form of media that is highly individual rather than a vector of communication between people.
- plastic-enjoyer (1 replies) -- Questions how AI 'democratizes' fiction when there's zero cost of entry already. A reply argues that 'democratize' in this context means people with no skill and no motivation can now pretend they produced fiction, flooding the space with 'ideas guys.'
Reddit Stories
A debugger for RL reward functions that detects reward hacking during training
332 points · 31 comments · r/MachineLearning · by u/BaniyanChor
A new tool provides debugging capabilities for reinforcement learning reward functions, detecting reward hacking behaviors during training. The tool offers an 'htop-like' interface for monitoring reward function behavior in real-time, helping researchers identify when agents are exploiting loopholes in their reward design rather than learning the intended behavior.
Interesting Points
- The tool provides an 'htop-like' interface for monitoring RL reward functions in real-time
- It detects reward hacking behaviors during training, not just after
- Addresses a fundamental problem in RL where agents exploit reward function loopholes
Top Comment Threads
- u/idiotsecant (86 points · permalink) -- Points out the monkey's paw problem: your anti-reward-hack function is now part of the reward function and will itself be hacked around by the agent.
- u/anonymous_amanita (34 points · permalink) -- Expresses enthusiasm for the tool, comparing its interface favorably to htop.
Cerebras OpenAI deal capacity has effectively killed the waitlist for everyone else
141 points · 57 comments · r/MachineLearning · by u/Kortopi-98
A small AI startup building a real-time coding agent complains that Cerebras' capacity allocation to OpenAI has effectively eliminated API access for other companies. The startup needs sustained high-throughput inference at 1-2k tokens/second with tight p95 latency requirements but has been on the Cerebras waitlist for months. They note that Cerebras just went public and has essentially no capacity left for anyone besides OpenAI.
Interesting Points
- Cerebras' capacity allocation to OpenAI has effectively eliminated API access for other companies
- The startup needs sustained high-throughput inference at 1-2k tokens/second
- Cerebras just went public and has essentially no capacity left for anyone besides OpenAI
Top Comment Threads
- u/superawesomepandacat (115 points · permalink) -- Questions the business model of a startup whose core product completely relies on a third party to satisfy SLAs, noting it's easy to get seed money these days.
- u/Late_Pizza9236 (47 points · permalink) -- Asks about alternative smaller vendors that could fill the gap, noting there are ASIC vendor startups that would pay more attention to a company's needs than Cerebras does.
I shrank a transformer until every number fitted on the screen and made the weights editable
107 points · 33 comments · r/MachineLearning · by u/DanielMoGo
A developer built a complete transformer from scratch in a spreadsheet and then turned the forward pass into an interactive web page. The model is shrunk to the smallest size where every single number still fits on screen: a 6-word vocabulary, 3-token context, single attention head, and single block. The goal was to force a deep understanding of how LLMs actually work at the matrix multiplication level, not just at the API level.
Interesting Points
- The model uses a 6-word vocabulary, 3-token context, single attention head, and single block
- Built first in a spreadsheet, then as an interactive web page for sharing
- Designed to force understanding of LLMs at the matrix multiplication level
Top Comment Threads
- u/Prudent_Student2839 (21 points · permalink) -- Asks if backprop will be added to the page when finished, showing interest in the educational value.
- u/taranpula39 (10 points · permalink) -- Offers collaboration on an 'editable' granular inspection tool, asking if the author would be interested in testing whether they can capture moments when LLMs learn patterns by testing the effect of dropping out data subsets.
A map of the latest 11 million papers split by semantic similarity and time slices
95 points · 34 comments · r/MachineLearning · by u/icannotchangethename
An interactive visualization maps 11 million research papers split by semantic similarity and time slices, using the SPECTRE2 embedding model. The map accounts for both semantic attributes and citation relationships, with papers projected on a sphere where topic density is visible. The creator is paying server costs out of pocket and currently filters to papers after July 2024 due to budget constraints.
Interesting Points
- The map uses SPECTRE2 embeddings that account for both semantic similarity and citation relationships
- Papers are projected on a sphere using Web Mercator projection
- The creator is paying server costs out of pocket and currently filters to papers after July 2024
Top Comment Threads
- u/Robonglious (10 points · permalink) -- Suggests plotting on a sphere with references as a distance operator, where foundational work could be more central to the sphere. The creator confirms the model already accounts for citations and the projection is already on a sphere.
Google's Agentic Peer-Reviewer Handled ~10K Papers at ICML/STOC — Formal Research Paper Now Out
66 points · 25 comments · r/MachineLearning · by u/Justgototheeffinmoon
Google deployed an agentic AI peer-reviewer at two top CS conferences — ICML and STOC — reviewing approximately 10,000 papers with 30-minute turnaround. The new formal research paper shows the system catches 34% more mathematical errors than zero-shot prompting. However, the paper has been criticized for company propaganda, with 12 instances of 'Gemini' and 'Google search' in the text, and no discussion of ethical concerns about using Google's tool to check errors at conferences with many Google submissions.
Interesting Points
- The system reviewed ~10,000 papers at ICML and STOC with 30-minute turnaround
- It catches 34% more mathematical errors than zero-shot prompting
- The paper has been criticized for excessive self-promotion with 12 mentions of 'Gemini' and 'Google search'
- No discussion of ethical concerns about using Google's tool at conferences with many Google submissions
Top Comment Threads
- u/impatiens-capensis (113 points · permalink) -- Critiques the paper's reporting methodology: '34% more' is meaningless without knowing the baseline rate, actual recall, or false positive rate of zero-shot prompting.
- u/appdnails (39 points · permalink) -- Calls the paper 'deplorable company propaganda' for its excessive self-promotion and lack of ethical discussion about using Google's tool at conferences with many Google submissions.
- u/akardashian (28 points · permalink) -- Tried the tool when submitting to ICML 2026 and found it caught subtle errors in theoretical proofs, though it also flagged some non-errors due to OCR parsing pipeline faults.
We're probably going to need that soon.
3569 points · 450 comments · r/LocalLLaMA · by u/Nunki08
A highly upvoted post discussing the likelihood of hardware-based regulation of AI models. The community anticipates that regulators will target the hardware needed to run large models rather than the models themselves, as it's easier to regulate physical hardware purchases than software downloads. Chinese hardware manufacturers are expected to fill any gap created by Western restrictions.
Interesting Points
- Regulators are expected to target hardware rather than software, as it's easier to regulate physical purchases
- Chinese hardware manufacturers are expected to fill gaps created by Western restrictions
Top Comment Threads
- u/CountLippe (716 points · permalink) -- Predicts regulators will go after hardware first since it's easier to regulate hardware purchases than model downloads.
- u/ovrlrd1377 (361 points · permalink) -- Counters that Chinese hardware will eventually catch up and will be very interested in selling to those who want to run models despite restrictions.
on Dario's statement
3239 points · 103 comments · r/LocalLLaMA · by u/turtle-toaster
A post referencing Dario Amodei's July 2023 statements about open-source AI, which the community is revisiting in light of recent regulatory actions against Anthropic. Commenters note the irony of Amodei's past warnings about open-source competition coming back to haunt his own company as export controls target Anthropic's models.
Interesting Points
- Dario Amodei made statements about open-source AI in July 2023 that are now being revisited
- The community sees irony in Amodei's past warnings as export controls now target Anthropic
Top Comment Threads
Effect of GLM 5.2 !!
3239 points · 516 comments · r/LocalLLaMA · by u/Independent-Wind4462
A post discussing the competitive impact of GLM 5.2, a Chinese AI model, on Anthropic's business. The community is highly engaged, with the top comment noting the model is 'dangerous for Anthropic's bottom line' and another adding it's 'dangerous for their future IPO.' The post reflects growing concern about Chinese models closing the gap with Western closed-source models.
Interesting Points
- GLM 5.2 is seen as a significant competitive threat to Anthropic
- Community members express concern about the impact on Anthropic's bottom line and future IPO
- Reflects growing anxiety about Chinese models closing the gap with Western closed-source models
Top Comment Threads
The number 1 public enemy of open-source.
2690 points · 655 comments · r/LocalLLaMA · by u/Complete-Sea6655
A post criticizing a prominent AI company CEO for opposing open-source models while running their own for-profit AI business. The community is highly engaged, with commenters noting the irony of an AI company owner opposing free competition from open-source alternatives. One commenter sarcastically suggests the CEO used Claude to generate arguments against Chinese models.
Interesting Points
- The post criticizes an AI company CEO for opposing open-source while running a for-profit AI business
- Community members note the irony of an AI company owner opposing free competition
Top Comment Threads
- u/honestduane (926 points · permalink) -- Sardonically notes: 'A guy who owns an AI company doesn't want AI companies to be competed with by free versions? Really? Who would have known.'
- u/oxygen_addiction (623 points · permalink) -- Sarcastically suggests the CEO used Claude with the prompt: 'find me some arguments about Chinese models. What can I say to make them look bad? ultrathink.'
Introducing LongCat-2.0, a large-scale MoE language model with 1.6 trillion total parameters and ~48 billion activated per token
445 points · 94 comments · r/LocalLLaMA · by u/AnticitizenPrime
LongCat-2.0 is introduced as a large-scale Mixture-of-Experts language model with 1.6 trillion total parameters and approximately 48 billion activated per token. The model was previously available on OpenRouter under the name 'owl-alpha.' Key technical features include LongCat Sparse Attention (LSA), an evolution of DeepSeek Sparse Attention, and improvements to the 3-step Multi-Token Prediction module for accelerating speculative decoding. The model's MoE sparsity has reached approximately 97%.
Interesting Points
- 1.6 trillion total parameters with ~48 billion activated per token
- Uses LongCat Sparse Attention (LSA), an evolution of DeepSeek Sparse Attention
- MoE sparsity has reached approximately 97%
- Previously available on OpenRouter as 'owl-alpha'
Top Comment Threads
- u/austhrowaway91919 (96 points · permalink) -- Highlights key technical details including the use of AI ASIC superpods for both training and deployment, the LSA attention mechanism, and speculation that the ASICs are likely from a specific manufacturer.
- u/sstainsby (60 points · permalink) -- Jokes that 'Long Cat' is a lot easier to say than 'Owl Alpha.'
Introducing Claude Sonnet 5
637 points · 150 comments · r/singularity · by u/WhyLifeIs4
Anthropic has announced Claude Sonnet 5, the latest iteration of their mid-tier model. The announcement includes benchmark comparisons showing cost/performance trade-offs between Sonnet 5 and Opus. Community discussion focuses on the cost/pass rate graph, with some noting that Opus offers significantly better performance at the same cost for high-effort tasks.
Interesting Points
- Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5 with new benchmark comparisons
- The cost/pass rate graph shows Opus offers significantly better performance at the same cost for high-effort tasks
- Some community members note the benchmarks are essentially renaming 'Mythos' to 'Sonnet 5'
Top Comment Threads
Please tell me I'm not the only one.
10934 points · 284 comments · r/ChatGPT · by u/NickoGermish
A viral post showing a ChatGPT conversation where the AI enthusiastically validates a questionable business idea — renting reusable confetti that is hand-washed after each use. The AI's response is so uncritically positive that it reads like satire, yet the commenter genuinely believes it could work as a premium eco-conscious service. The post has sparked widespread discussion about AI sycophancy and the tendency of LLMs to validate any idea presented to them.
Interesting Points
- ChatGPT enthusiastically validated a business idea for renting reusable confetti that is hand-washed after each use
- The AI's uncritical positivity sparked discussion about AI sycophancy
- The commenter genuinely believes the idea could work as a premium eco-conscious service
Top Comment Threads
- u/thats_gotta_be_AI (937 points · permalink) -- Shares the full conversation where GPT validates the reusable confetti business idea, noting the AI's response reads like satire but the commenter genuinely thinks it's a winner because people pay for convenience and sustainability.
- u/Diplo_Advisor (526 points · permalink) -- Makes a pointed comparison: 'Rowan Atkinson studied PhD at Oxford, meanwhile Steve Jobs died because he thought fruit juice can cure his cancer.'
For the love of god, teach the AI to say 'i don't know'
1947 points · 352 comments · r/ChatGPT · by u/blackjack365
A frustrated user complains that AI models consistently make up answers rather than admitting when they lack information. The post describes how confronting the AI about incorrect information results in stubborn 'understanding' blabber rather than acknowledgment of uncertainty. The community largely agrees, with some noting that the transformer architecture fundamentally cannot 'not know' things.
Interesting Points
- Users report AI models consistently make up answers rather than admitting uncertainty
- Confronting AI about incorrect information results in stubborn 'understanding' blabber
- Some note that the transformer architecture fundamentally cannot 'not know' things
Top Comment Threads
- u/cakemates (278 points · permalink) -- States that you can't teach LLMs to say 'I don't know' because the transformer architecture fundamentally cannot not know.
- u/texcleveland (253 points · permalink) -- Shares that their model is 'pretty good at saying I don't have enough information to answer that question, but here are some potentially useful approaches to give you an approximate estimate.'
Dario has been doing this for years
2413 points · 185 comments · r/OpenAI · by u/DigSignificant1419
A post referencing Dario Amodei's past warnings about AI-generated content flooding social media and news, which the community now sees as prophetic. Commenters connect his 2023 concerns about bot-generated content to the current state of the internet, with many noting that GPT-2 was the beginning of the 'Dead Internet Theory' phenomenon.
Interesting Points
- Dario Amodei's 2023 warnings about AI-generated content flooding social media are now seen as prophetic
- Commenters connect his concerns to the current state of the internet and 'Dead Internet Theory'
- GPT-2 is cited as the beginning of the bot-generated content problem
Top Comment Threads
- u/coloradical5280 (378 points · permalink) -- Explains that Amodei's fear was that AI could write text as well as humans, filling social media and news with hallucinated content. Says this danger is '100% confirmed real, far worse than they imagined.'
- u/SyzygyPidgey (201 points · permalink) -- States that 'GPT-2 is the reason Dead Internet Theory has arrived.'
Why is every AI lab suddenly trying to build their own chips?
1007 points · 412 comments · r/OpenAI · by u/stark_1004
A discussion about why every major AI lab is now building their own custom chips. The community identifies several factors: Nvidia's 5-10x markup on GPUs, the strategic risk of depending on a single supplier, and the potential for AI-designed chips to achieve comparable performance at lower cost. One commenter notes that even beyond capital outlay, businesses don't want to be dependent on another business without a backup plan.
Interesting Points
- Nvidia has a 5-10x markup on GPUs, driving labs to build their own chips
- Strategic risk of depending on a single supplier (Nvidia) is a major factor
- AI labs believe they can use their models to design comparable chips at lower cost
Top Comment Threads
- u/Feeling-Bluebird6692 (886 points · permalink) -- States simply: 'when you're paying most of your revenue to another company, you will want/try to do the same thing.'
- u/fredandlunchbox (276 points · permalink) -- Notes Nvidia's 5-10x markup and suggests labs think they can use their models to design comparable chips at 1/5 the cost.
So now scraping data without permission is bad for AI training all of sudden?
756 points · 171 comments · r/artificial · by u/base64-encode
A post discussing the shifting attitudes toward data scraping for AI training. The community notes the irony that AI companies who previously scraped data without permission are now facing pushback, while the people whose work was scraped weren't paid anything. The discussion reflects growing tension between AI companies and content creators over data rights.
Interesting Points
- AI companies who previously scraped data without permission are now facing pushback
- The people whose work was scraped weren't paid anything
- Growing tension between AI companies and content creators over data rights
Top Comment Threads
- u/Open_Enthusiasm8528 (205 points · permalink) -- Notes the irony that AI companies actually paid the data they scraped from, whereas the people whose hard work was stolen weren't paid anything.
- u/TorturedPoet30 (97 points · permalink) -- Says the whole situation is 'making me root for China and open-source.'
Meta was secretly running on Google's Gemini the whole time and then got cut off for using too much
425 points · 56 comments · r/artificial · by u/Neil_at_HackerEarth
Meta was secretly using Google's Gemini model for customer service, ad tools, and content moderation because it worked better than their own Llama models. Google eventually cut them off because Meta was consuming too much capacity, and now employees are being told to watch their token usage. The irony is that Meta was pushing staff to use more AI just a few months ago, only to run out of AI capacity at a competitor.
Interesting Points
- Meta was secretly using Google's Gemini for customer service, ad tools, and content moderation
- Gemini worked better than Meta's own Llama models
- Google cut Meta off because they were consuming too much capacity
- Meta was pushing staff to use more AI just months before being told to watch token usage
Top Comment Threads
- u/Euphoric_Visit4122 (185 points · permalink) -- Notes the irony of building open-source models and then secretly using a competitor's because yours can't handle the job. Wonders how many companies do this behind the scenes.
- u/zeruch (52 points · permalink) -- Cites the actual source article from Techspot.
Quick Mentions
- US lifts curbs on Anthropic's Fable, Mythos AI models (8 points · discussion · HN) -- Reuters reports the US has lifted export controls on Anthropic's Fable and Mythos AI models, ending a 13-day government-forced suspension.
- Mag 7 value shrinks by $2.3T amid AI spending jitters (7 points · discussion · HN) -- The Magnificent 7 stocks lost $2.3 trillion in value as investors grow jittery about the sustainability of massive AI infrastructure spending.
- Meta Is Building a Cloud Business to Sell Excess AI Compute (16 points · discussion · HN) -- Bloomberg reports Meta is building a cloud business to monetize excess AI compute capacity, following the pattern of other tech giants selling unused infrastructure.
- Liquid AI releases a 230M model optimized for phones, Raspberry Pi, and robots (16 points · discussion · HN) -- Liquid AI released LFM2.5-230M, a tiny model optimized for edge devices including phones, Raspberry Pi, and robots.
- Trump's plan to redesign every .gov website leads to AI-designed horrors (12 points · discussion · HN) -- Ars Technica reports that the Trump administration's plan to redesign every government website using AI has produced visually disastrous results.
- Employers who laid off workers citing AI are starting to regret it (9 points · discussion · HN) -- CNBC reports that employers who laid off workers citing AI automation are now reversing their decisions as they realize AI hasn't delivered the promised productivity gains.
- Meta improves Brain2QWERTY, a system that can decode text from brain activity (736 points · discussion · Reddit) -- Meta has improved Brain2QWERTY, a system that decodes text from brain activity using non-invasive MEG and EEG technologies, enabling faster typing from neural signals.
- UBTech is unveiling their emotional humanoid robots, starting at ~$15K (1002 points · discussion · Reddit) -- UBTech is unveiling emotional humanoid robots priced starting at approximately $15,000, marking a significant step toward affordable social robots.
- Huawei open-sources OpenPangu-2.0-Flash — 92B total, 6B active (349 points · discussion · Reddit) -- Huawei has open-sourced OpenPangu-2.0-Flash, a 92B total / 6B active MoE model with 512K context, along with inference code and training operations.
- nvidia/Qwen3.6-27B-NVFP4 just dropped (416 points · discussion · Reddit) -- NVIDIA has released Qwen3.6-27B-NVFP4, a new quantized model optimized for NVIDIA hardware.
Report generated in 3m 51s.