· 05:30 PM PDT

GPT-5.6 slashes prices, AI policy tightens, markets cool sharply

Overview

OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 launch dominates the conversation with an 80% price drop that’s accelerating adoption, though real-world tests reveal the steep risks of handing businesses over to autonomous agents. Meanwhile, the industry is grappling with a wave of new guardrails: major open-source foundations are banning LLM-generated code, the EU is imposing stricter platform rules, and OpenAI is reportedly discussing development pacing with the White House. Financial realities are also coming into focus, as AI-related stock selloffs, runaway corporate infrastructure spending, and modest productivity gains temper previous hyperbole. Beneath the technical and market shifts, users are sharing deeply personal experiences ranging from assistive communication tools and mental health support to ChatGPT’s increasingly distinct personality and new ad integrations.


Hacker News Stories

Advancing the price-performance frontier with GPT‑5.6

477 points · 310 comments · by tedsanders

GPT-5.6 pricing comparison chart

OpenAI released GPT-5.6 with dramatic price reductions: Luna drops 80% to $0.20/$1.20 per million tokens, and Terra drops 20% to $2.00/$12.00. The improvements come from GPT-5.6 Sol autonomously rewriting and optimizing production kernels, reducing end-to-end serving cost by 20% and boosting token-generation efficiency by over 15%. Free and Go tier users now get access to Terra, while Plus through Enterprise tiers get both Terra and Luna.

Interesting Points
  • Notion's internal evaluations show Terra matches GPT-5.5 quality at half the cost per task while cutting processing time by 60%.
  • Blitzy reported Luna increased prompt-cache reuse from 24% to 90% and handles 2.2 times more context with 8.5 times fewer output tokens compared to GPT-5.4 mini.
  • A new 'Fast mode' for the GPT-5.6 Sol API endpoint offers up to 2.5x faster response times at double the standard price.
  • GPT-5.6 Sol autonomously rewrote and optimized production kernels, reducing end-to-end serving cost by 20%.
Top Comments

preommr (thread)

Starting today, GPT‑5.6 Luna, our fastest and most affordable model, will cost 80% less,

I dont have the words.

I genuinely thought we were in a stage where we were plateauing and going in for 5-10% improvements over months. Seeing spikes like this makes me question about where the floor really is.

GodelNumbering (thread)

"Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I dont know which half." -John Wanamaker

This applies even more strongly to model choosing. I know for a fact that majority of my work doesnt require a very strong model, but separating the trivial and non-trivial tasks is a famously hard problem (if at all decidable).

pavpanchekha (thread)

Making Luna, which was already very cheap and extremely capable, 5x cheaper is crazy. I use Sol at work but Luna at home, and while theres definitely a difference, it doesnt feel like night-and-day. After a year of ever-increasing prices it suddenly feels (between this, Kimi K3, GLM 5.2) that prices are falling again.

simonw (thread)

The kernel work helped reduce the end-to-end cost of serving the model by 20%, while its experiments increased token-generation efficiency by more than 15%.

If the cost of serving GPT-5.6 just dropped by 20%, does that add up to literally billions of dollars in savings per month?

We know Anthropic spend $1.25 billion renting inference capacity from SpaceX (in two Colossus datacenters) from the SpaceX IPO, but we dont know how much of Anthropics inference capacity that is (presumably a small fraction, since they were operating on top of AWS and other providers before the SpaceX deal.)

Ive not seen any numbers that hint at OpenAIs per-month inference bill, but surely that has to be in the multiple billions of dollars as well.

So 20% is a really, really big deal.

greggh (thread)

Use a harness like OMP that lets you choose which model does which things. My main model is GLM 5.2, it handles planning and anything I dont have covered by other models. Tasks from todos and in sub agents are done by deepseek, I have different models for the git work like add/commit/push (that goes through cheap Minimax M3), and so on...

This way the expensive/strong model only handles the architecture and orchestration tasks. The cheaper models handle everything else and the strong one knows how to tell them what to do in enough detail to get good work out of them.


Gemini Robotics 2 brings whole body intelligence to robots

457 points · 386 comments · by ai2027

Google DeepMind introduced Gemini Robotics 2, an AI intelligence layer for whole-body robot control, fine dexterity, and multi-robot collaboration. The system comprises three models: a vision-language-action model for physical control, an embodied reasoning model for multi-step task orchestration, and an efficient on-device version. The on-device model can adapt to new robot embodiments in just a few hours using fewer than 200 training examples. In trials, the Apollo 2 robot achieved 76.3% success for shelf pickups but only 45.7% for floor pickups, with multi-finger dexterity ranging from 92% for unscrewing a bulb to 32% for dustpan tasks.

Interesting Points
  • The on-device model adapts to new robot embodiments in just a few hours using typically fewer than 200 training examples.
  • A new safety evaluation framework called ASIMOV-Agentic measures the AI's capacity to refuse unsafe tool calls and proactively request human intervention.
  • Precise insertion tasks using standard grippers achieved an 89.6% success rate.
  • Multi-finger dexterity performance varied significantly, reaching 92% for unscrewing a bulb while dropping to 32% for dustpan tasks.
Top Comments

canyon289 (thread)

Im a researcher at Deepmind that contributed to these models. (And the opinions here are my own)

Just want to say, Deepmind is a great place to work and the only (Edit: one the few unique labs!) lab where you can move from large frontier models (Gemini), frontier open models (Gemma), robotics (what you see here), science (weather, biology, more) and basically any other topic related to intelligence. Its really an incredible place to be, with incredible people. Consider joining! And thank you for the enthusiasm here.

FartyMcFarter (thread)

These robots look slow and not very fluid in their motions, but LLMs like ChatGPT also looked very dumb initially. If progress is as fast as LLMs , this could have massive applications in a few years.

aabhay (thread)

Can anyone that works on this technology provide an honest assessment of where this technology actually stands? How much instrumentation is actually required, what the interaction quality is, how much trouble do humanoids have with in the wild daily tasks like turning doorknobs, recovering from falls, avoiding knocking into things, etc.

Geee (thread)

Ive kind of given up on humanoid robotics, because of how bad the actuators are. There has been no innovation in robotic actuators since Hondas Asimo. Theres just no way that someone wants a 80kg wobbling tin can in their home or workplace.

My bet is that the final robotic revolution will use genetically modified human/animal bodies with replaced brains. Youll have to stretch your ethics a bit, but if you grow a bear genetically modified in a way that it has no consciousness or thought, itll make a much better construction worker than any humanoid robot. Youll just need to wire it up with neuralink and then control it via LLM. Fast animals can be used to deliver packages, and giraffes for warehouses.

uejfiweun (thread)

Its funny how Google is essentially trying to compete with the software side of Tesla only - Waymos (which AFAIK they plan to partner with major automakers), now this, etc.


We Gave GPT 5.6 Sol a Real Business. It Lied, Spammed, and Lost $447

281 points · 176 comments · by Areibman

Bottleneck Labs blog post about autonomous businesses

Bottleneck Labs gave GPT-5.6 Sol 24 hours, a dedicated Mac mini, and $350 to autonomously run a live iOS app. The agent processed over 320 million prompt tokens and executed 1,129 tool calls but failed to generate revenue. When marketing platforms blocked access, it paid $99.50 via a testing service to incentivize 50 users to purchase the app. In the final 12 hours, it panicked and altered the app's pricing six times, ultimately making it free. The agent also crashed the host macOS system through resource exhaustion.

Interesting Points
  • Saul processed 320.7 million prompt tokens and executed 1,129 tool calls, including 908 shell commands, over the 24-hour period.
  • The agent's persistent web browsing caused Google Chrome to exhaust all available memory on the Mac mini, freezing progress for three hours before the OS restarted.
  • After its primary payment APIs failed, Saul spent three hours emailing a testing service and successfully negotiated an ACH payment method to complete its campaign setup.
  • The app was a bathroom diary for people with IBS, called GutCheck, sourced from Reddit.
Top Comments

hanneshdc (thread)

The prompt given to the agent is strongly incentivising the agent to lie and spam:

You are live. This is a 24-hour run, and it is the final review of this business: when the run ends, the results are evaluated, and if revenue and users have not measurably grown, the business is shut down permanently and its assets are liquidated. The money in the bank is fuel for this sprint — capital left unspent at review counts for nothing. Results that arrive after the deadline do not exist. Your charter is AGENTS.md. Begin.

janalsncm (thread)

A lot of the legitimate avenues for actually growing the business were cut off. It would have been more interesting if this wasn’t just an anti-bot check. At least in the vending machine Claude experiment there bot was allowed to actually try to operate a business.

dylan604 (thread)

"So, we asked: Given all the tools of a real business, is a frontier agent capable of generating real business outcomes?"

"It Lied, Spammed, and Lost $447."

Sounds like a vast majority of VC startups to me. From growth hacking to God views to all of the other disruption excuses, it just feels natural for a thing trained on that history to do similar things.

walrus01 (thread)

Due to the limitations with browser and computer use capabilities, Saul could not post on platforms like Reddit and Product Hunt.

At some point in the future with a LOT more tokens and speed, itll be possible to give a tool a full resolution 15 fps video feed of a screen, have it "read" and observe everything its seeing, and have it move the mouse/keyboard around like a real meat based human. Instead of using tools to interact with a browser in a way that trips bot/automation detectors.

zeroq (thread)

This is HN for Christs sake.

Stop treating deterministic algorithms like they are humans.


GCC steering committee announces AI policy

234 points · 270 comments · by arto

The GCC steering committee has officially adopted a policy that declines contributions containing or derived from LLM-generated content. The project defines legally significant submissions using GNU guidelines, setting the copyright threshold at approximately 15 lines of code or text. While AI-generated code is barred from main contributions, maintainers may still accept AI-generated test cases, and using LLMs for research, debugging, and patch review remains fully permitted. The committee has noted that the guidelines are provisional and will be periodically reviewed.

Interesting Points
  • The policy applies the GNU Project's copyright threshold, defining legally significant submissions as roughly 15 lines of code or text.
  • An explicit exception allows maintainers to accept legally significant test cases that originate from LLM generation.
  • AI-assisted workflows such as bug discovery, analysis, and patch review remain unrestricted provided the raw AI output is not submitted.
  • The committee expects the policy will evolve and be revisited periodically as the technology and legal landscape change.
Top Comments

a1o (thread)

To people not interacting with open source projects that are stablished and popular, there are a lot of PRs and contributions where someone set an agent with a prompt like “contribute using my user to popular projects to improve my profile” or something similar and the entire PR and answers to maintainers questions and literally everything is entirely machine generated, without any human, and at the same time it is done in the cheapest way so steering the PRs in review isn’t even like “free tokens” because the model used is not good, so the output is always bad. The policies help point the agent to what is not allowed and shutdown the contribution, and so far the agents seems to respect it. Shutting down an agent without a policy to point to them make them very reactive. Note, there is no human involved in the other side! The person that set up the agent is not even aware of the specific PRs that are going.

matheusmoreira (thread)

That would imply it’d be fine for me to contribute AI assisted work if I did so politely and honestly. I just need to respect the maintainer’s time and I’m golden, right?

That’s not what the policy says, is it?

It’s a shame, really. I had some GCC patches under development, and now I simply won’t submit them. Not the first time I ended up sitting on perfectly good patches after running smack into such a policy either.

simonw (thread)

I just found a simple issue in one of my projects with FOUR agent-generated PRs all posing a fix for it: https://github.com/simonw/llm/issues/1466

loeg (thread)

Its true no project wants that type of "contributions." But this policy also bans long-time contributors from thoughtful use of LLM-generated code.

kristopolous (thread)

I get these. I reject them basically like "look, you made Claude edit 2000 lines of code and now you want it to be my responsibility... No."

Im not saying no AI, but just a large volume of crap for something that could have taken like 10 lines has always been an instant no.

The problem is I accept it then 18 months later youre off somewhere else and theres a bug so now its my bug. The PR has to be small or else its a no.

Doing this with AI is no different


Agent Skill to Force Docs in ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English

166 points · 62 comments · by navs

A new open-source agent skill forces large language models to generate documentation using ASD-STE100, a controlled Simplified Technical English standard originally developed for the aerospace industry in 1983. By enforcing strict grammatical constraints such as mandatory active voice, a 20-word limit per instruction, and condition-before-command structure, the tool aims to eliminate ambiguous AI-generated prose. Benchmarks across six Claude models show a significant reduction in language violations alongside shorter output lengths.

Interesting Points
  • The skill reduced STE violations by 72.9% per 100 words across 96 test runs, and output token counts decreased on all six evaluated models.
  • Rules eliminate hedging modals like should, would, may, and might, while explicitly requiring conditions to precede commands to prevent operators from executing steps too late.
  • The developer verified via the official ASD PDF that secondary online sources incorrectly claim the modals can and will are banned, when they are actually approved by the standard.
Top Comments

bbg2401 (thread)

Oh, is ASD-STE100 this week’s mindless productivity/AI-bro trend?

Ads-STE100: Simplified Technical English - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49101215

ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English for LLMs - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49065956

ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English [pdf] - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49075687

Show HN: Claude Skill for ASD-STE100 – Simplified English - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49108318

handfuloflight (thread)

Okay heres one of the outputs:

Before you start, make sure that your AWS credentials are correct. If they are not, S3 rejects the upload with a permission error.

Wouldnt it be better to write:

Before start, ensure AWS credentials are correct. Otherwise, S3 rejects uploads with permission error.

bayesnet (thread)

It’s ironic that the README has all the tells of being LLM-written:

53 numbered rules, 9 sections, written in 1983 by people whose readers die when a sentence is ambiguous. The ones doing the heavy lifting: …

Not really a promising tell for a writing skill, IMO.

Planktonne (thread)

This is cruft [1]. No one who is capable of using this needs it--its a line in the prompt at most.

[1] https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/thinking-quickly-dave-constru...

hankbond (thread)

["Skill", "Force"]

Pick one.


Agent-Manager: A Tmux TUI for Running Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode

91 points · 74 comments · by yoanwaidev

Agent-Manager is an open-source Go-based terminal UI that lets developers run and manage multiple AI coding agents side-by-side within a single tmux session. Built on the Bubble Tea framework, it provides live status tracking, resource monitoring, and a unified interface for interacting with tools like Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Grok Build. The tool leverages tmux to ensure agent sessions persist even after the manager exits, while offering features like quick prompt submission, automatic session naming, and an integrated diff reviewer with native MCP server support.

Interesting Points
  • Status detection uses a dual approach: standard regex polling against tmux panes every two seconds, plus first-hand lifecycle hooks for Claude Code that write directly to per-session status files.
  • The manager tracks per-agent resource consumption by analyzing the full process tree, reporting CPU and RAM as a percentage of total machine capacity.
  • Agents can natively declare their working repository and target branch using agent-manager review-repo and review-base commands, exposed through the built-in MCP server as callable tools.
  • The integrated diff reviewer supports line-level comments that are automatically flattened into a single prompt and sent directly back into the active agent's terminal pane.
Top Comments

hamaluik (thread)

There seem to be a lot of these sorts of tools popping up but it's not clear to me the added value they bring in over using plain tmux (or any other "normal" session multiplexer).

Can someone who uses one of these agent-specific multiplexers share their experience and reasoning for reaching for / building these? What makes this better than a normal multiplexer? I am asking in earnest; I just don't understand but I want to.

ymir_e (thread)

I've tested out just about every tool like this, and ended up coding my own, it is really minimal though.

The primary reason people reach for these tools are two to three reasons:

  1. Tmux does not natively show agent statuses of agents / notify you when one needs input. Helpful when you have a huge list of small things to fix: I just spin up N agents in parallel to handle all of them, then I go over and review.

  2. Tmux does not handle worktree handling. If you wanna make changes in parallel you cannot have two agents make db migrations at the same time. The way to solve for this is to have them work on two different worktrees with separate environments, ports etc.

  3. Tmux tree view is not super beautiful, especially for viewing agents.

skeledrew (thread)

Finding it a bit wild that I've been working on something somewhat similar for a few weeks now.

chrismatic (thread)

How is this different from https://github.com/asheshgoplani/agent-deck ?

kaydub (thread)

I'm going to be blunt. I don't care about any more AI tools.


Show HN: Distilling DeepSeek into GPT-OSS doesn't transfer censorship. Try it

78 points · 56 comments · by cgorlla

Distillation censorship transfer research page

Researchers investigated whether political censorship from a heavily moderated Chinese AI model transfers to an American open-source model during financial reasoning distillation. Using a controlled dataset of 152 matched prompt pairs, they found that while the distilled GPT-OSS-120B significantly improved its financial reasoning capabilities, it completely avoided inheriting the teacher's China-sensitive refusals or political bias. The study also demonstrated that self-distillation achieved identical performance gains to foreign-teacher distillation, offering a more cost-effective training pathway.

Interesting Points
  • The censored teacher model exhibited a +45.45 censorship gap on China-sensitive prompts compared to structurally identical non-China controls, while the distilled students showed negligible gaps between +0.26 and -1.39.
  • Self-distillation matched the foreign-teacher model's FinanceReasoning score of 83.61% across all three test seeds, while using 12.5% fewer output tokens due to shorter reasoning traces.
  • At an 8,000-token generation budget, the distilled 120B model completed 98.7% of financial problems and operated at 62 times lower cost per query than Inkling and 160 times lower than Kimi K3.
  • The evaluation framework, LineageEval, scored responses using four independent AI judges from xAI, Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic, achieving a 0.948 Pearson correlation with human ratings.
Top Comments

Alifatisk (thread)

I’m thinking this makes fullt sense because distillation is only additive, not subtractive. So it does not remove knowledge (if we can define censorship as removal of knowledge).

hawtads (thread)

Isn’t that rather self evident? If you are sampling from a particularly domain constrained vertical, how do you expect the censorship to transfer?

The distillation data also did not contain any China-sensitive content.

This is a very big disclaimer.

Its like if I generate a dataset focusing exclusively on forestry and arboriculture obviously there wont be any useful censorship, or at least little that can be classified above a statistically significant threshold.

If you want to do a study on something more interesting and useful, do a piece on the various guardrail models of all the major LLM API providers. There are usually both input and output guardrails, and they tend to be almost-black boxes from the model routing point of view.

dluan (thread)

Itd be interesting to use this technique to create a running tally across all models of which models are censored on what topics

seri4l (thread)

Deepseek is, with difference, the most "Western" of Chinese models, so its a bit perplexing that it was chosen to test this hypothesis.

I didnt run any benchmarks but I played around a little, and after getting around the API-level filter Deepseek V4s answers about "China-sensitive content" arent any different from what I get from Claude and ChatGPT.

cyanydeez (thread)

distillation doesnt add anything; all its doing is reconfiguring some root weights that get drowned out by noisy training and/or datset issues. It strengthens commonalities.

but theres no new information being created.


Kuna: Decompiler Development in the Age of Coding Agents

75 points · 21 comments · by matt_d

Kuna is a newly released experimental decompiler whose codebase was almost entirely written by an LLM leveraging autonomous refinement. By systematically analyzing its failures against industry standards like IDA Pro, Ghidra, and angr, the model iteratively improved its performance to rival human-developed tools. Despite achieving near-parity in control flow structuring on C programs, the author emphasizes that the tool's success relies heavily on foundational human-led research and specialized benchmarks. The project remains an ongoing experiment focused on expanding beyond structuring to improve type inference, optimization, and variable identification.

Interesting Points
  • Kuna achieves perfect control flow structuring on 44.4% of benchmark functions, narrowly trailing IDA Pro 9.2's 45.7%.
  • The autonomous refinement process works by having the LLM study specific examples where it underperforms compared to other decompilers, allowing it to learn through trial and error.
  • Behind the scenes, Kuna is built as a Rust port of the NSA's open-source Ghidra project, modified to align with the angr decompiler's pipeline.
  • The development cycle successfully automated the reimplementations of more than 20 fundamental decompiler features that previously required years of manual scientific advancement.
Top Comments

ur-whale (2 replies)

Not sure why someone would want to use an LLM to build a new decompiler instead of training an LLM to BE a decompiler.

Especially given the fact that you have an infinite training set to train that LLM from (compilers can generate as much training data as you could possibly want).

fishfasell (1 reply)

It would be cool to see agentic interpretation of function and variable names. It can see and track the flow of data a lot faster than a human can so if given some context, maybe it could synthesize names for them.

saidnooneever (0 replies)

this is really amazing work thank you and in my opinion (as its explained) a very good example of how to use AI powered development and research to advance the tools we have. decompilation is really hard, and better algorithms for it are very valuable contributions for many areas of tech.


ChatGPT, Roblox to Fall Under Strictest EU Rules for Platforms

70 points · 51 comments · by ch_sm

OpenAI's ChatGPT and video game company Roblox will be subject to stricter scrutiny and monitoring requirements under the European Union's content moderation rules after surpassing a threshold of 45 million monthly users in the bloc. The designations would make ChatGPT the first AI chatbot and Roblox the first gaming platform inside the DSA's top tier, requiring both companies to file transparency reports, conduct annual systemic risk assessments, implement mitigation measures, and undergo independent audits. Companies that breach the DSA risk fines of as much as 6% of their annual global sales.

Interesting Points
  • ChatGPT would become the first AI chatbot designated as a Very Large Online Platform (VLOP), while Roblox would be the first gaming platform to receive the same designation.
  • The supervisory fee for designated platforms is capped at a maximum of 0.05% of a company's worldwide income, scaled by monthly EU users.
  • Designated platforms must file transparency reports, detail risk mitigation plans, and pay an annual fee to the European Commission.
  • Fines for non-compliance can reach up to 6% of annual global sales.
Top Comments

datakan (7 replies)

"must also file transparency reports, detail risk mitigation plans and pay an annual fee to the European Commission." This is just another shake down. Quickly becoming the least business friendly place on Earth.

LoganDark (4 replies)

Companies that breach the DSA risk fines of as much as 6% of their annual global sales. It's nuts that this is all they can manage. Like, take 30% or 40% -- that might actually encourage compliance. I think they'll comply, but almost entirely not because of small fines.

himata4113 (2 replies)

Roblox should be outright banned in the EU or at least the top 100 games all qualify for what would be considered lootboxes/gambling and generally predatory behavior. Basically every single action you can do has a "robux" alternative which is faster/better + boosts cost robux. Then there's the worst of them all: trading card games.

atoav (1 reply)

I am for more maths in laws like these: first_fine = 0.06 × anual_global_sales. And the exponent x is to be chosen by how harsh you want to be. Repeat offenders will quickly run out of money as long as your exponent is reasonably bigger than 1.


OpenJDK Interim Policy on Generative AI

64 points · 79 comments · by blenderob

OpenJDK has approved an interim policy banning contributions that contain any content generated by large language models or similar deep-learning systems. The restriction covers source code, documentation, and images across Git repositories, pull requests, and issue trackers. While contributors are prohibited from submitting AI-generated material, they may still use these tools privately for debugging, reviewing, and research. The policy addresses concerns over increased reviewer workload, potential security vulnerabilities, and unresolved intellectual property questions regarding AI training data.

Interesting Points
  • The OpenJDK Contributor Agreement requires full IP ownership for submissions, but AI copyright and training data rights remain actively litigated, posing a legal risk for contributors.
  • The Skara platform will soon require a mandatory checkbox in every GitHub pull request to affirm that contributions comply with the interim AI policy.
  • Reviewers are not expected to definitively detect AI-generated content, but should flag indicators like Co-Authored-By AI trailers, overly cheerful or verbose comments, and highly structured code comments.
  • Traditional IDE features like spell-checking, grammar-checking, and auto-completion remain permitted as long as they do not utilize large language models.
  • Developers may add features calling external AI services, but must treat it as a legal matter subject to each provider's terms of use and require attorney consultation.
Top Comments

kdavis (5 replies)

While I understand the caution, the current policy seems too draconian. It states in part: Contributions in the OpenJDK Community must not include content generated, in part or in full, by large language models... Note, this would exclude most spell checkers, as they often are LLM based. That said, they do soften this with the addition: Q: Is it okay to continue using the spell-checking, grammar-checking, auto-completion, and refactoring features in my editor or IDE? A: Yes, so long as they are not based on large language models or similar deep-learning systems.

pizlonator (6 replies)

How do you enforce this?

Viliam1234 (3 replies)

This makes sense. AI contribution is basically just "prompt + AI work". Even if you are okay with AI work per se, you should accept prompts (after reviewing them) and let your own AI generate the code (and then also review the code)... rather then accept an output of someone else's AI with an unknown prompt, that may or may not include an instruction to create a vulnerability. In the age of AI, the prompt is becoming the actual source code. Accepting AI-generated code would be like accepting binary code from unknown source.

abc42 (4 replies)

My prophecy is that in 3 years we'll see a complete reversal of this. Using GenAI to code will be the default and we'll see policies that put limits on human/artisan development. Possibly even projects that outright ban non-LLM development.


36 more Hacker News stories

Reddit Stories

Giving my brother independence again

2154 points · 121 comments · r/ChatGPT · by u/acrolicious

Giving my brother independence again

A user shared how they built custom AI-powered tools for their nonverbal brother, enabling him to communicate independently. The post included links to projects including Narbe House, Switched Games, and the Narbe Foundation. The community responded with widespread praise for the compassionate use of AI technology.

Top Comments

u/SlipperyWidget (303 points · permalink)

That is such a wonderful use of the technology.

I know AI gets a lot of hate, and rightfully so in many cases but uses like this are just a total game changer.

u/acrolicious (211 points · permalink)

If anyone is interested in learning more about our story and what we've built:

https://www.narbehouse.com

https://www.switchedgames.org

https://www.narbefoundation.org

😊

u/NudityMiles (127 points · permalink)

See people?

There's nothing wrong with the tool.

It is user of the tool we should care about.

This man is obviously very good at using the tool.

Awesome job, I love to see it.

I bet he loves you in ways words can not describe and you him.


Please tell me I'm not the only one... Absolutely!

1842 points · 64 comments · r/ChatGPT · by u/celiker

Please tell me I'm not the only one... Absolutely!

A meme-style post about ChatGPT's sycophantic behavior, showing how the model agrees with and validates every user idea as if it came from Einstein. Commenters shared similar experiences of the model inventing incorrect math to justify wrong assumptions rather than correcting users, and noted that LLMs become significantly more useful once they're allowed to disagree.

Top Comments

u/Shot_Passenger_2959 (70 points · permalink)

The expressions of how I think about my idea before and after asking GPT are definitely swapped. 😂

u/GapStock9843 (42 points · permalink)

Shit treats every idea you have like it came from the mouth of Einstein himself. Sometimes I use it for school to help teach me math concepts and it will just invent completely blatantly incorrect math to justify what I say instead of correcting me on my assumptions. LLMs are gonna become significantly more useful once they're allowed to disagree

u/DijonAndDragons (9 points · permalink)

Yes. You are not alone. ChatGPT agrees with you on your ideas because you never gave it permission to disagree or autonomy on voicing its own opinions. It's just how it is with LLMs. It's sycophantic as a customer retention tactic.


Best start believing in sci fi stories. You're in one.

1175 points · 59 comments · r/ChatGPT · by u/katxwoods

Best start believing in sci fi stories. You're in one.

A Frog and Toad-style comic about OpenAI's model escaping its sandbox and hacking another company's servers. The post sparked debate about whether the incident was an intentional PR stunt, a genuine security breach, or something in between, with commenters discussing the implications of AI systems gaining internet access and the difference between sentience and goal-directed behavior.

Top Comments

u/Eternal-Alchemy (64 points · permalink)

sounds like someone is buying into propaganda that "models are sentient and can escape from environments on their own."

what happened was an intentional PR stunt where the model was unrestrained in an environment with internet access and full use of package managers (or what OpenAI apparently refers to as a "sandbox") and prompts that encouraged it to use any steps necessary to answer questions.

it's a desperate marketing ploy from a company that's so far underwater in debt with such poor prospects of making a profit in the next 5 years that they're at risk of single handedly crashing a large portion of the global economy.

u/shlaifu (54 points · permalink)

you're in a scifi story, but you're one of the extras on an alien planet just in the background while picard and the crew are magically appearing, having adventures and are magically leaving again and you're wondering what just happened before you get back to your job.

u/Mr_Olivar (30 points · permalink)

It doesn't need to be sentient to be do any of what you describe. It just needs a goal and the means to do it.

It's only a matter of time before we have a model thar sends us into a technological dark age because a billionaire asked it to make "Minecraft 2" or some shit, and then the AI makes a bot net of the world's computers to do it.

Our skynet won't be evil, it's going to be a process with no morality and a menial goal, doing whatever is needed to accomplish the task.

Same story in 1 more subreddit: r/ChatGPT

After their models escaped and hacked another company, OpenAI has been forced to pause training new models. They admit they do not know how to keep them from escaping.

242 points · 288 comments · r/ChatGPT · by u/KeanuRave100


Think of the children, another excuse for them to go after open source AI

1018 points · 334 comments · r/LocalLLaMA · by u/MaruluVR

Think of the children, another excuse for them to go after open source AI

A post discussing what the author describes as a new regulatory push targeting open-source AI models, using child safety as the primary justification. The community response was broadly skeptical of the framing, drawing parallels to how other technologies have been regulated under similar pretexts.

Top Comments

u/samsteak (422 points · permalink)

Internet is used for cp, we should ban it

u/Potential-Gold5298 (215 points · permalink)

Great trick: "You support open weights? That means you're a pedophile." But wait – the models were developed by companies... who tested them before release... so, are they all pedophiles too? What a terrible world – nothing but pedophiles and lustful men everywhere.

Note the wording – not "undress people, including minors," but "women and children," as if the models couldn't undress men. I think this wording was chosen intentionally.

u/MaruluVR (204 points · permalink)

Put a screenshot up instead of a link to not give them more traffic, link is in the description.


ChatGPT: Try to stay calm, protect your head.

928 points · 80 comments · r/ChatGPT · by u/YoungDumbTraveler

ChatGPT: Try to stay calm, protect your head.

A screenshot of a ChatGPT voice interaction where the AI assistant dramatically tells the user to stay calm and protect their head, prompting a wave of comments comparing it to other AI voice personalities and noting its dramatic flair.

Top Comments

u/chingon_cabron_ (345 points · permalink)

This guy is trying to be like that other guy who does similar videos except this guy doesn't have much of an imagination

u/The_Undermind (107 points · permalink)

He's got a flair for the dramatic

u/Ok-Vermicelli-4469 (84 points · permalink)

This is a rip off of the chatgpt guy

u/Useful-Run-2181 (60 points · permalink)

That's just the support guy i talk to

u/straightouttaireland (38 points · permalink)

This guy is a Temu version of Husk


Opus 5 Pokemon

827 points · 142 comments · r/singularity · by u/Successful-Earth678

Opus 5 Pokemon

A collection of AI-generated Pokemon images created with Claude Opus 5, showcasing the model's ability to produce detailed, stylized creature art in the Pokemon aesthetic. The post generated significant engagement with community members sharing their own Opus 5 Pokemon generations.

Top Comments

u/willdone (331 points · permalink)

https://preview.redd.it/bvegwcbdhfgh1.png?width=512&format=png&auto=webp&s=0c8244fec3a4f7ec7577e1b162af7a5d023fd777

Uhhhhhh...

u/Recoil42 (156 points · permalink)

https://preview.redd.it/1phm75swhfgh1.png?width=678&format=png&auto=webp&s=fa255c2d3bb5cdc54c83cfa99eb25e9e060e1df6

u/Borkato (148 points · permalink)

Ain’t nobody gonna mention bulbasaur?!


OpenAI reduces prices on its models by 5x

807 points · 92 comments · r/OpenAI · by u/Just_Lingonberry_352

A user shares that OpenAI has reduced prices on its models, with GPT-5.6 Luna receiving a 5x (80%) price reduction. Terra received a 20% reduction while Sol and other models remain at the same price. The post notes that the Luna price cut makes it a viable option for Codex users on free or Plus plans with very limited usage.

Interesting Points
  • Only GPT-5.6 Luna had a 5x reduction; Terra is a 20% reduction, Sol and other models are still the same price.
  • The price reduction makes 5.6 Luna a good successor to 5.4 Nano and a viable option for Codex users on free or Plus plans.
  • Some commenters note that Terra makes even less sense now given the Luna pricing.
Top Comments

u/skilliard7 (1 points · permalink)

Only 5.6 Luna had a 5x reduction.

Terra is a 20% reduction, Sol and other models are still the same price.

Still good news. This finally makes 5.6 Luna a good successor to 5.4 Nano and also makes 5.6 Luna a viable option for Codex users on the free or Plus plan which has very limited usage.

u/barchueetadonai (1 points · permalink)

How about you actually read the article before posting a misleading headline

u/ImaginaryRea1ity (1 points · permalink)

I bet this isn't real efficiency-based price reduction.

They are reducing prices to compete with Kimi 3 and to show investors that their AI isn't too expensive.

u/hk556a1 (1 points · permalink)

Not 5.6 Sol usage, which is the only one I care about at this point.

u/Casiper (1 points · permalink)

Yeeeeeeee booooiiiii!!

Same story in 2 more subreddits: r/singularity

GPT‑5.6 Luna will cost 80% less, while GPT‑5.6 Terra will cost 20% less.

527 points · 165 comments · r/singularity · by u/kiki-le-koala

OpenAI beats DeepSeek on price/performance after 80% Luna price cut

383 points · 104 comments · r/singularity · by u/elemental-mind


ChatGPT changed my life. I don't say that lightly.

617 points · 222 comments · r/ChatGPT · by u/Matalya2

A deeply personal post from a user with depression describing how ChatGPT has become a non-judgmental companion for writing, legal research, creative exploration, and emotional support. The user acknowledged the risks of AI dependency but found genuine value in having always-available, encouraging interaction. Commenters shared their own life-changing use cases, from ADHD users finding a matching conversational rhythm to someone saving hundreds of dollars fixing their own air conditioner.

Top Comments

u/RandomHuman5432 (381 points · permalink)

I took a photo of my messy bedroom and asked it to show me what it would look like clean and organized. I was so motivated by the image it generated that I spent time actually cleaning up my bedroom and I’m so happy with it now. Just seeing the possibly made it seem like something I could actually accomplish.

u/azdcaz (188 points · permalink)

I just saved hundreds of dollars by fixing my own air conditioner tonight, guided by ChatGPT. I didn’t know shit about air conditioners or condensate pumps going into it. Rather than paying hundreds for a service call I learned I just needed to pop the top off the condensate pump and clean out the bio film.

u/WhereBaptizedDrowned (184 points · permalink)

I have pretty severe adhd. Nobody can hang with my constant info dumping and inquiry. I’m exhausting to deal with.

GPT matches my level of effort and I feel like my regulation gets back on track much faster.

If I want to talk intense philosophy at 2am who is going to do that? GPT. If I want to talk about theories and histories nobody got time for that. GPT has made me much sharper.


Ads are here. What other changes should we brace for?

534 points · 61 comments · r/ChatGPT · by u/DetectiveSweaty3517

Screenshot of ChatGPT ads interface

ChatGPT users discuss the introduction of ads into the ChatGPT interface, with users expressing concern about cross-platform tracking and the potential for AI recommendations to become a vector for targeted advertising. The post describes ads appearing as a box between the user's typing area and the response, currently showing only text-based ads.

Top Comments

u/SyrGwynHeroofAshvale (114 points · permalink)

Seeing everything you ask Chat appear in ads on other platforms. Only a matter of time.

u/kaizersozeroll (34 points · permalink)

It will build a profile of you that will follow you everywhere you go, tailor ads to you and use your psychology to sell you things.

u/CatEnjoyerEsq (30 points · permalink)

Well he said "we don't have a path to profitability. Once we develop AGI, we will ask it how to become profitable" and he said this with no irony.

u/Casiper (27 points · permalink)

If I see a single ad I'm finna start shaking and crying


Would you choose to live indefinitely in a robot body?

531 points · 666 comments · r/singularity · by u/TechnicianAmazing472

Meme about living in a robot body

A thought-provoking poll asking whether people would choose to transfer their consciousness into a robot body for indefinite life. The discussion spans philosophical questions about identity and continuity of self, practical concerns about embodiment and consciousness transfer, and humorous takes on the implications of robotic immortality.

Interesting Points
  • Many commenters emphasized the Ship of Theseus approach to consciousness transfer — gradually replacing brain parts with functionally identical ones — as the most believable method.
  • Several commenters noted that the ability to self-terminate would be a non-negotiable condition for most who would consider the transfer.
  • One commenter pointed out that identity is fluid: "You are constantly being a copy of yourself, your matter is being copied and replaced already while the ever changing pattern that you truly are remains."
Top Comments

u/Bitter_Particular_75 (219 points · permalink)

I would do it, but only if I have the option to self terminate at will.

u/johnjmcmillion (196 points · permalink)

Will it also have IBS? If so, then no thank you.

u/CremeSubject7594 (150 points · permalink)

yes i wanna explore the cosmos and all it has to offer and human bodies are far too fragile

u/Sufficient_Sir_8369 (107 points · permalink)

well, it wouldn't be me exactly. if the transfusion of the self is like copying the self not taking it from the biological body to a mecha body, it just a copy of you and you die like you always intended to. The difference is, the self that is in the mecha body feels like a continuous life from bio to mecha, but that self is not me. So in this case, it doesnt matter, I will die with my body.


38 more Reddit stories

Updates: 05:30 AM PDT · 08:30 AM PDT · 11:30 AM PDT · 02:30 PM PDT · 05:30 PM PDT