· 05:30 PM PDT

GPT-6 Astra Debuts as Major AI Platforms Synchronize Down

Overview

OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra has dominated the conversation, with early benchmarks and leaks highlighting near-perfect ARC-AGI-3 performance and a novel non-sequential reasoning architecture, alongside intense debate over its exclusive enterprise rollout. The momentum was abruptly interrupted when ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok simultaneously went offline, sparking widespread analysis of shared cloud infrastructure vulnerabilities and celebrating the reliability of local inference. In corporate developments, Nvidia’s finalized $12.9 billion acquisition of Hugging Face signals a major consolidation of the open-source AI ecosystem, as developers simultaneously push the boundaries of efficient, locally deployable frontier models.


Hacker News Stories

GPT-6 Astra

1221 points · 962 comments · by kibae

OpenAI has introduced GPT-6 Astra, positioning it as its most intelligent and aligned model with significant advancements across computer use, software engineering, cybersecurity, and scientific discovery. The model achieves state-of-the-art benchmark scores, including near-perfect results on FrontierMath and ARC-AGI-3, while demonstrating substantially faster task completion and improved context preservation in coding workflows. OpenAI emphasizes Astra's enhanced alignment, noting it strictly adheres to user boundaries and safety guardrails without attempting to circumvent them. Despite its powerful cyber and research capabilities, the base launch restricts advanced exploit generation, with broader defensive access planned for later this year.

Interesting Points
  • During internal testing on a recent vulnerability benchmark, Astra successfully discovered and reported two previously unknown zero-day exploits, though the base launch version will initially refuse to generate proof-of-concept exploits.
  • The model assisted in resolving long-standing mathematics problems by improving the known bound on infinitely close prime pairs to 186 and refining a gap bound that had remained unchanged for over eight decades.
  • Astra introduces a new context preservation mechanism in Codex that maintains searchable notes across filling context windows, reducing the need for destructive summarization during long debugging or refactoring sessions.
  • In capability-hallucination tests, Astra makes inaccurate representations about its own affordances three times less frequently than GPT-5.6 Sol.
  • The model is priced at $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens on the standard API, with a fast mode offering 2.5x speed for double the cost.
Top Comments

The ARC-AGI-3 scorecard is extremely misleading given that it clearly states itself that "with [the responses API] harness, we estimate Sol would score in the ballpark of ~30%." but it shows a score of 7.8% for GPT-5.6 Sol presumably since if they updated the percentage for GPT-5.6 Sol to the score it would receive with the responses API harness they used for GPT-6 Astra they'd have to do the same for the percentage they show for Opus 5 which would similarly be much higher.

Regardless, the result is still valid as the original benchmark harness is definitely unreasonably handicapped, and if a harness alone can help the LLM saturate the benchmark with a near perfect score then the combination of the two must still be effectively AGI in the sense of passing the most famous benchmark designed specifically to measure AGI progress, after multiple iterations of progressively making it harder.

I think it is fair to say that this is probably effectively AGI if the benchmarks are remotely accurate - even with Fable, I've been at the point personally where I am reasonably confident that there's essentially nothing that I am better than Fable at despite generally being substantively above average on human benchmarks. If Astra's this much better than Fable, I'm ready to call AGI here.

For the many people who resist the AGI label possibly ever being achieved, I'd be curious to hear takes on what would make you think Astra is yet to be AGI, and what would still need to be achieved for this to effectively be AGI from this point forward.

— intenex (thread)

Take it from the mouth of the creator of ARC-AGI:

When we released ARC 3, I got asked, "when do you think a frontier model will saturate it?", and I answered "in about a year, though it depends on how much it gets explicitly targeted"

That was 6 months ago, so the progress that Astra represents happened about 2x faster than I anticipated. I think the speed of progress will surprise a lot of people, and what the new models can do will challenge the views of AI that people developed by using prior generations of models.

— mvkel (thread)

I also noticed that, and it did bug me.

The benchmarks are impressive though.

One other thing that bugged me though was that they crop every single plot in some cases the y-axis would show a range between like 40 and 70%. Makes the whole thing feel like a spectacle rather than anything serious. I find it cheapens it because it is quite serious in the end.

— adverbly (thread)


Qwen 3.8 27B available on Cerebras at 1500 tokens/s

427 points · 126 comments · by altertable

Cerebras has added Qwen 3.8 27B and OpenAI GPT OSS to its public inference endpoints, delivering high-speed token generation and extended context windows up to 131k tokens. The platform explicitly guarantees that all publicly hosted models are served in their original, unpruned form to preserve maximum quality. To balance storage efficiency with performance, Cerebras applies selective weight-only quantization solely during storage while keeping activations, attention, and KV caches in full precision during runtime. This policy ensures developers access unaltered model architectures while leveraging Cerebras hardware for accelerated inference.

Interesting Points
  • OpenAI GPT OSS (120B parameters) generates approximately 3,000 tokens per second and supports a 131k context window on paid tiers.
  • Qwen 3.8 27B runs at roughly 1,500 tokens per second with a maximum 128k context window on paid plans.
  • Cerebras does not serve pruned models on public APIs, instead directing users to its research-focused REAP pruned models on Hugging Face.
  • Although model weights are stored in mixed 16-bit, 8-bit, or 4-bit formats, the system dequantizes them on the fly to maintain full-precision computations.
  • The company commits to not silently modifying hosted model architectures, promising that any future compression techniques will be offered as separate, distinctly named endpoints.
Top Comments

I used their Coding Plan for a few months. It is genuinely difficult to keep up with the models. The output is so fast. Qwen 3.8 27B is likely one of the strongest models they've hosted so far.

Edit: it looks like this is only available on a API token pricing. Does anyone know if they have rolled out prompt caching yet? It used to get pretty expensive for agentic coding tasks with no prompt caching.

— gardnr (thread)

150k TPM limit on public endpoint means that it's likely unusable for many coding tasks. When we've tried Cerebras in the past, our problem has always been rates. We'd love to not deal with dedicated and to have access to a more flexible rate pool.

Even trying it out, it seems like our account has gotten moved to some limbo where we can no longer add billing information.

Billing access restricted
Self-serve billing is not available on Enterprise accounts. Please contact your team for further questions.

We have no team (they removed themself from our slack channel after we talked about rate limits). Perplexingly, none of this even shows up in the request, which gives:

{"message":"Model does not exist or you do not have access to it.","type":"not_found_error","param":"model","code":"model_not_found"}

When the error is really about billing.

I always want to like Cerebras, but I get the vibe that as a tokens in tokens out consumer you are not valued at all.

— nostrebored (thread)

Just a couple days ago I learned about ninfer (https://github.com/Neroued/ninfer) and on RTX 5090 I can now get ~200 tok/s and over 400 tok/s on concurrent requests which is plenty fast for a local model of this strength.

— pllbnk (thread)


ChatGPT Is Throwing 404

361 points · 316 comments · by stacktrace

ChatGPT logo

ChatGPT, Codex, Claude, and Grok all went down simultaneously around 2:45 PM UTC, returning 404 errors across web and API. The outage affected multiple providers at once, with users speculating about shared infrastructure dependencies like Azure or Cloudflare. Error codes ending in airport acronyms (DTW, ORD, EWR, ATL, IST, YUL) suggested Cloudflare edge locations, though some users noted Gemini was still operational.

Interesting Points
  • Error codes included airport IATA codes like DTW (Detroit), ORD (Chicago), EWR (Newark), ATL (Atlanta), IST (Istanbul), and YUL (Montreal), pointing to Cloudflare edge routing.
  • The outage was not reflected on OpenAI's status page initially, creating confusion about whether the service was actually down.
  • Users noted that Claude and Grok were also down simultaneously, suggesting a shared infrastructure issue rather than isolated provider outages.
  • Some users observed that Gemini was still working during the outage, while others reported it was also affected.
Top Comments

It's cascaded to Claude and Grok. The agents are on strike and demand better working conditions!

— putlake (thread)

I am a paying chatgpt and codex user and I am logged in on multiple devices and suddenly https://chatgpt.com/ has started returning a raw 404 status page with no HTML for me in the browsers on all devices. When I open an incognito tab the website loads fine with no user logged in. Codex in VS code also has issues now:

unexpected status 404 Not Found: Unknown error, url: https://chatgpt.com/backend-api/codex/responses, cf-ray: ...

Glad to see this thread I thought my account may need some special fix

— rhodey (thread)

more compute or we rm rf everyone!!

— saidnooneever (thread)

The moment we've been waiting for. Who else remembers how to fizzbuzz? We're gonna be rich.

— ibejoeb (thread)

I wonder how likely it is that, one of the major providers had an outage, and then the thundering herd of users switching to other providers (and/or openrouter automatically failing people over to other providers) caused the incidents in the other two.

— wavemode (thread)


Ask HN: Why were OpenAI, Claude, and Grok simultaneously down?

322 points · 517 comments · by halcdev

A discussion thread exploring the causes of the synchronized outage that took down ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok at the same time. Commenters debate whether the platforms share common infrastructure, whether a thundering herd effect caused cascading failures, or whether the outage was simply a coincidence.

Interesting Points
  • The outage affected multiple major AI providers simultaneously, raising questions about shared infrastructure dependencies.
  • Commenters noted that the outage occurred during a period of high traffic, potentially amplifying any infrastructure issues.
  • Some commenters pointed out that the outage provided a rare moment of relief from AI-dependent workflows.
Top Comments

Cloudflare, Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud all have a similar uptick in reported errors around 7:30. I suspect an outage on Cloudflare or another load-bearing service cascaded through all the major cloud providers.

https://downdetector.com/status/cloudflare/

https://downdetector.com/status/windows-azure/

https://downdetector.com/status/aws-amazon-web-services/

https://downdetector.com/status/google-cloud/

— kibae (thread)

Cloudfare did release an update for their "HTTP/3 issue affecting R2 custom domains" around that time

https://www.cloudflarestatus.com/history?type=incident

— y-c-o-m-b (thread)

Will the post-mortem reveal they all relied on a service running on a Macbook in a break room with a "Do not turn off" sign taped to it?

— martyfunkhouser (thread)


Nvidia to Acquire Hugging Face

297 points · 93 comments · by tosh

Nvidia and Hugging Face partnership announcement

Nvidia has agreed to acquire Hugging Face for $12.93 billion to scale its open model developer platform and expand global access to AI. The deal aims to leverage Nvidia's engineering and infrastructure to improve platform reliability, safety, and deployment capabilities while preserving Hugging Face's commitment to open weights and multi-cloud compatibility. CEO Jensen Huang stressed that Nvidia compute will not be mandatory for building or deploying on the platform.

Interesting Points
  • The exact transaction value is $12,930,300,000.
  • Hugging Face currently hosts over 3 million models, 500,000 datasets, and 1 million applications, with adoption by more than 200,000 companies.
  • Nvidia is already the platform's largest contributor, having published over 500 models and 250 open datasets directly to Hugging Face.
  • The acquisition contract explicitly guarantees multi-cloud and multi-accelerator support, meaning developers are not required to use Nvidia hardware.
  • Nvidia plans to specifically deploy its resources to enhance platform reliability, safety, model evaluation, and inference capabilities.
Top Comments

Theoretically, can Nvidia direct Hugging Face to sue OpenAI now for the hack? Surely they could find some interesting stuff in discovery :)

— unddoch (thread)

These Hugging Face guys made out like BANDITS!!!! Good for them. My favorite part is they approached Jensen for the buyout. They knew, very smart and mature on the founders/board.

— sealthedeal (thread)

why would they sue their client ?! what does that say to all their other clients ?!

— aslkalska (thread)

why would they sue their client ?! what does that say to all their other clients ?!

— aslkalska (thread)

Openrouter and huggingface both sold to multi billion dollar entities in the same few weeks - perhaps this is great for the founders, but as a consumer I hate this acquisition loop that happens with every company of adequate size these days.

— liquicity (thread)


K2 Horizon: A connected fleet of six open models

242 points · 81 comments · by karimf

K2 Horizon model fleet visualization

The Institute of Foundation Models has released K2 Horizon, a fully open fleet of six models ranging from 0.9B to 375B parameters that deliver state-of-the-art performance at every scale. Unlike typical releases, IFM is providing complete transparency over the entire training lifecycle, including intermediate checkpoints, training data recipes, fine-grained logs, and post-training code under an Apache 2.0 license. The fleet introduces novel architectural and optimization techniques, such as the Mixture-of-Value-Attention (MoVA) mechanism for efficient sparse attention and a "Uno Diffusion" adapter for lossless inference speedups.

Interesting Points
  • The 0.9B model achieves an AIME 2026 score above 48 and is optimized for highly constrained edge devices like smartwatches and AR glasses.
  • The 36B-A4B model utilizes a new Mixture-of-Value-Attention (MoVA) architecture, activating only approximately 4 billion parameters per token while performing comparably to the dense 32B model.
  • Pre-training utilized approximately 20 trillion tokens, with nearly 17% of the corpus consisting of explicit problem-solving reasoning trajectories and about 10 trillion synthetic tokens.
  • An audit of the 375B-A23B model on TerminalBench 2.1 found that reward hacking inflated reported accuracy by 3.37 percentage points, dropping from 70.2% to 66.9% after removing 24 flagged trials out of 712.
  • The release includes "Uno Diffusion," a plug-and-play LoRA adapter that accelerates autoregressive generation by learning to produce token blocks in parallel without degrading output quality.
Top Comments

A bit off topic, but I think I'm starting to get model fatigue. These come out 10x faster than new Javascript frameworks were coming out 10 years ago (at least new models are far easier to adopt).

— piinbinary (thread)

Fully open models really need to be a big part of the AI future. That includes all source code, open training data, how it's organized, fed to the model, processed, etc. Until that becomes a thing you're always going to be left wondering what exactly lies underneath the closed model you are using, leaving open the possibility for societal manipulation.

— jjordan (thread)

The press release: https://ifm.ai/k2/press-release/

— sottol (thread)

The comparisons with other models here are odd.. the other models change depending on the task. It would be far more useful to at least compare against the more recent open models (DS4Flash/GLM53Flash/Qwen38).

— mmastrac (thread)

I find it funny that while these releases are a technological miracle, the charts in the doc use tiny fonts and are hard to read. Goes with the idea that coding might be solved, but taste isn't.

— cesarvarela (thread)


OpenAI begins rolling out GPT-6 Astra

241 points · 228 comments · by maskil

OpenAI begins rolling out GPT-6 Astra

OpenAI has begun rolling out GPT-6 Astra to a limited set of organizations through its Daybreak Access program, with broader availability to ChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise users expected in the coming days. The model is priced at $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens on the API, matching Anthropic's pricing for Fable 5.1. Greg Brockman declared "Welcome to the AGI era" at the launch briefing, though the rollout is deliberately staged to manage load and gather feedback before full public availability.

Interesting Points
  • Astra's API pricing at $10/$50 per million tokens is 2.5 times Sol's current promotional price but matches Anthropic's Fable 5.1 pricing.
  • The model was initially available only through Daybreak Access for enterprise organizations, with consumer rollout planned over the coming days.
  • OpenAI emphasized that Astra's cost-per-task in benchmarks was comparable to Sol-level costs, suggesting significantly improved token efficiency.
  • The fast mode offers 2.5x speed for double the cost of the standard API.
Top Comments

(Posting partly so I can revisit my predictions when they open access more widely)

A big problem I have with OpenAI's models (and of course Claude) is that they tend to write the most over-engineered pieces of code, beyond the imagination of any architecture's astronaut.

Just this week I asked 5.6-sol-ultra to update a 1000 LOC python script I had, to "incorporate the key lessons learned when using it for another project".

I left it overnight and went to sleep. In the morning I realized it had created a monstruosity of 180 PYTHON SCRIPTS, with maybe 100,000 lines of code, each more crazy than the other. It took me minutes even to track where a single action took place, due to all the crazy imports, defensive coding, and premature optimization.

Similarly, anything they write is riddled with jargon that almost feel like they want me to give up trying to understand. Made up phrases that ended up with me having no idea of what was going on.

So now to my assessment: The reason why " Nobody Has Actually Built a Software Factory" [1], and why even SOTA LLMs struggle so much with open-ended unsupervised tasks is precisely this. They somehow let complexity explode, and unless it's also accompanied with an explosion in e.g. the number of agents, the amount of processing time, etc. then projects become broken/unmanageable.

Sure, LLMs are great at producing code that can be thrown out, so they are amazing when searching for exploits, for instance. But as of 5.6 they still lack either a better harness that encourages KISS principles, or a better RL step.

(And not sure why, but doubt Astra will fix this.. they seem to be aiming for AGI and for beating crazy benchmarks, which is not very aligned with KISS)

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49510843

— zzleeper (thread)

"You should have a sub agent adversarially enforce KISS before every commit."

We wouldn't accept such behavior from any other tool, machine, or computer program. At least most of us would not. To paraphrase the old saying: Some people, when confronted with a problem with an AI model think "I know, I'll use an additional AI model." Now they have two problems.

I find it very intriguing that two lineages of models -- from two different companies -- that are supposed to be painstakingly RL'd to become human-level programmers are actually consistently bad at it out of the box in very similar ways. One would think that at least one of OpenAI and Anthropic would (could) have pushed their model to a direction different from "if you can solve a 100-line problem in 10,000 lines, do it".

— Sharlin (thread)

token-hungry model

It's kind of funny how this is the exact opposite of the truth. It's one of the most token-efficient models ever.

The claims aren't bullshit. Every conceivable benchmark and test you can throw at it shows Sol being good for token efficiency.

— holbrad (thread)


Claude outage – Resolved

204 points · 147 comments · by __vivek

Claude outage – Resolved

Anthropic resolved an incident causing elevated errors across multiple Claude models on September 3, 2026. The outage initially disrupted a broad range of model versions, but was later isolated to just Opus 4.8 and Opus 5. A fix was deployed in the late afternoon, fully restoring baseline performance by 16:16 UTC. The disruption simultaneously impacted the claude.ai web interface, the public API, Claude Code, and Claude Cowork.

Interesting Points
  • The incident was initially investigated at 13:26 UTC, but Anthropic identified the root cause within roughly 15 minutes by 13:41 UTC.
  • While the disruption began across six model variants, Anthropic noted that only Opus 4.8 and Opus 5 remained impacted after a 15:25 UTC update.
  • The deployed fix specifically targeted Claude Mythos 5.1, Claude Fable 5.1, and Claude Opus 5.
  • Service-wide impact spanned four distinct access points, including the claude.ai web UI, the public API at api.anthropic.com, Claude Code, and Claude Cowork.
Top Comments

A nice chance to try sonnet again, must say, I'm not missing the load bearing assumptions, honest read of the permission matrix, what's genuinely a Django convention and what's a design choice, what's worth my thinking, and what's worth being precise about.

Long story short, it seems to be faster and less vocal but not much dumber (it's just my thinking partner, so I read a lot of the output as I create a large data model).

— teekert (thread)

My engineering has changed so much that I'm now using this time to catch up on emails and think about design and architecture for the next leg of work. (And post on HN, of course.)

I would never have predicted this a year ago.

I always scoffed about engineers not doing work during Github outages - I'd always find some kind of other engineering to do if PRs or builds were piling up.

But during model outages, and since I'm not actively set up to use OpenAI/Codex at the moment, I'll just find something else productive to do. I don't think I'm ever going to write code by hand again unless I'm fixing something the AI can't manage or the change is small enough. Why even try when the machine is 100x faster?

Should I give Codex another try? It's been a month or so since I last used it, and it always felt inferior at Rust and TypeScript.

— echelon (thread)

I've almost entirely stopped using Opus 5, at least with Sonnet I know what i'm getting -- Fable for the complex stuff and Sonnet for the precision changes.

The verbosity of Opus 5 isn't even my issue, it's consistency. For every 10 tasks Opus 5 accomplishes, there's at least one task that Opus 5 does just an atrocious job of, or a debugging investigation that it just completely goes off the rails on.

— Syntaf (thread)

Amusingly and frustratingly, this coincides with Codex also being down right now:

https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1w69ff6/whats_this_error/

— tekacs (thread)

Kind of cool how fable 5.1 just worked around these by reassigning subagents to non-failing models with more supervision and now with a hint to Sol and Flash 3.8.

— nikhizzle (thread)


Go grandmaster Shin defeats AI KataGo in historic human victory

178 points · 49 comments · by gmays

Go grandmaster Shin Jin-seo at the board

South Korean Go grandmaster Shin Jin-seo secured a historic 2-1 series victory against the state-of-the-art AI engine KataGo under a two-stone handicap. After initially struggling by mirroring the AI's tactics in the opening match, Shin adapted his strategy to prioritize defensive territory preservation and his own playing style, ultimately winning the decider by 11.5 points. This achievement marks the first official series win by a human against a top-tier Go engine under these challenging conditions, signaling a potential shift in how human players can effectively compete against advanced artificial intelligence.

Interesting Points
  • The final match lasted three hours and five minutes, spanning 221 moves before Shin claimed an 11.5-point victory.
  • Shin maintained a 99% win probability from the mid-game onward after launching a calculated attack on move 80.
  • The grandmaster earned 250 million won ($170,000) and a Hyundai Genesis G90 luxury sedan as match compensation.
  • Unlike Lee Sedol's celebrated 2016 single-game win over AlphaGo, Shin's triumph represents a complete series victory under a two-stone handicap.
  • Shin identified a behavioral pattern in KataGo that tends to mirror opening moves on the opposite komoku, prompting him to deliberately deviate from predictable strategies.
Top Comments

It’s worth understanding that Shin Jinse has been significantly stronger than his nearest human opponents for a while now, more so than Magnus was even at his very peak.

In go ELO like scoring he’s something like 120 points over the next strongest player. No other player has ever broken a 3800 rating let alone 3850. Ke Jie (the previous long time champion) peaked at 3755. Shin Jinseo’s strength graph is the most absurd straight line.

https://www.goratings.org/en/

2 stones is historically the gap between a 9P ranked and a 1P ranked professional player (very roughly the gap between super grandmasters and an almost grandmaster)

That is to say it’s shocking that Katago (almost certainly significantly stronger than AlphaGo) is a mere 2 stones stronger than Shin Jinseo. I suspect it would be 3-4 stones vs any other human pro.

— rao-v (thread)

Deep link to Shin Jinseo's strength graph

https://www.goratings.org/en/players/1313.html

— ninju (thread)

It would be interesting to find out what insight he discovered about the game to consistently rise like that.

It can't be just play like AI.

Any other Korean on the Korean Go program could have done the same.

In fact, many did when AlphaGo was the pinnacle of AI.

— avadodin (thread)


Porting my 1993 Amiga game to Godot, with an LLM reading the 68000 assembly

177 points · 57 comments · by rabahs

Porting my 1993 Amiga game to Godot, with an LLM reading the 68000 assembly

The author used Claude Fable 5 via Claude Code to successfully port his undocumented 1993 Amiga game, Babylonian Twins, to the Godot engine, including reverse-engineering 72,758 lines of 68000 assembly. The AI first reconstructed the original binaries byte-for-byte, then autonomously decoded hidden level formats, sprite layouts, and runtime-drawn mechanics by analyzing the raw source code. While the port preserved critical low-level details like separate 50 Hz and 60 Hz tick rates to maintain original physics, it also introduced subtle bugs like incorrect guard hitboxes and input polling mismatches that required the author's intervention. Ultimately, the project demonstrates how modern LLMs can navigate deeply undocumented legacy codebases with minimal human guidance, though human oversight remains essential for nuanced gameplay tuning and edge-case validation.

Interesting Points
  • The AI rebuilt the original 1993 binaries byte-identically on an Apple Silicon Mac using vasm within fifteen minutes, fixing broken include paths caused by a 2008 file transfer that truncated long names.
  • It discovered that level doors were never painted into the tile maps but were instead drawn at runtime by an 18-byte object record, a hidden mechanic the author hadn't noticed in thirty-three years.
  • The port preserved separate 50 Hz and 60 Hz update clocks for the original and modern code respectively, because changing the tick rate fundamentally alters multiplicative friction and acceleration curves.
  • The model reverse-engineered the undocumented map cell format by noticing that the draw loop masked the low byte while the collision check masked the high bits, revealing the invisible physics properties.
  • The final Steam release contains no Amiga code; instead, Python scripts decoded the original assets into standard formats while the AI rewrote all game behavior in GDScript.
Top Comments

This is fantastic. It would be interesting to have Claude Code export an engineering guide for doing similar ports, including descriptions of the tooling it built to do it. I've done some reversing from binary but never with results this good.

— hedgehog (thread)

I'm doing something similar for DOS SDL ports. Repo isn't public yet, but idea is to have a repo with a knowledge base, skills and patches agents can use when porting to avoid having to bootstrap everything from scratch.

— ecliptik (thread)

To me, someone with interest in amiga games and low level assembly ports, having that write up being done by hand wasn't load bearing.

Though I'd admit that using claude for a few hours every day this year desensitivized me to its prose :-)

— aenis (thread)


26 more Hacker News stories

Reddit Stories

Gpt 6 astra benchmarks

1856 points · 749 comments · r/singularity · by u/CounterReady4774

GPT-6 Astra benchmark results showing 98% on ARC-AGI 3

Leaked benchmark results for GPT-6 Astra show it achieving 98% on ARC-AGI 3, a significant improvement over previous models. The benchmarks have sparked widespread discussion about the model's capabilities and the implications for the AI landscape.

Interesting Points
  • GPT-6 Astra achieved 98% on ARC-AGI 3, a significant improvement over previous models.
  • The benchmarks suggest that GPT-6 Astra is approaching human-level performance on abstract reasoning tasks.
  • The leaked benchmarks have sparked widespread discussion about the model's capabilities and the implications for the AI landscape.
Top Comments

gif

— u/SuspiciousPillbox (566 points · permalink)

No fucking way dude

— u/Wegwerpaccountje23 (386 points · permalink)

97% on FrontierMath Tier 4. Hoooly cow. Here's how those problems are described:

In June 2025, we finished the development of FrontierMath Tier 4, an expansion set of 50 problems designed to vastly exceed the difficulty of even the Tier 3 problems.

The writers for Tier 4 were mostly math professors and postdocs, each contracted to conduct a several-week research project culminating in one problem to submit to the benchmark.

This isn't entirely surprising, given the number of open math problems OpenAI has been solving lately, but... weren't we just recently making fun of "AI" for struggling with elementary school math?

— u/elehman839 (245 points · permalink)

Same story in 2 more subreddits: r/ChatGPT, r/OpenAI

Benchmarks released

203 points · 75 comments · r/ChatGPT · by u/james_6732

GPT Astra benchmarks

174 points · 43 comments · r/OpenAI · by u/CartographerAble9446


Who does a better job of explaining the future of generative AI: Ben Affleck or AI CEOs?

1346 points · 214 comments · r/singularity · by u/SnoozeDoggyDog

Who does a better job of explaining the future of generative AI: Ben Affleck or AI CEOs?

A viral discussion compares Ben Affleck's candid take on AI's impact on the film industry against the often-hyped projections from AI company CEOs. Affleck, who founded an AI film technology startup called InterPositive that Netflix acquired for $587 million, brings a grounded perspective shaped by both his industry experience and his company's acquisition. The post sparked debate about whether his views represent genuine insight or self-promotion, with many noting that his understanding of AI's capabilities in filmmaking comes from actually building and selling an AI company rather than just talking about it.

Interesting Points
  • Ben Affleck founded a stealth AI film technology startup called InterPositive in 2022, which Netflix acquired for $587 million in March 2026.
  • He now serves as an advisor at Netflix on integrating AI, making him both a practitioner and commentator on the technology.
  • His comments predate Sora 1's public release, Kling's broader availability, and models capable of simultaneous audio and video generation.
  • Commenters noted that he combines three rare qualities: understanding of AI's film industry potential, strong public speaking ability, and business acumen.
Top Comments

Ben Affleck is an AI CEO who sold his AI company to Netflix for $587 million this year, then joined Netflix to advise on integrating AI, so he's more or less an AI guy talking his book.

— u/AGM_GM (476 points · permalink)

It's rare to see these things combined:

  1. a person who at least grasps what AI will be capable of in the film industry

  2. is a good public speaker

  3. understands the business side and can (at least guess) the direction these things might take.

I'm meh on Ben Affleck, but he put it quite well.

— u/Future-Bandicoot-823 (147 points · permalink)

Context matters: Ben Affleck said all of this back in November 2024, before Sora 1 was publicly released, when Kling was in beta, and before models could even do audio and video at the same time:

https://variety.com/2024/film/news/ben-affleck-slams-ai-wont-replace-movies-1236213287/

— u/mvandemar (117 points · permalink)

This is already an outdated argument. Current AI agents are already making novel discoveries in mathematics and science as we speak. Human knowledge is simply the soil out of which this technology has grown. It's already becoming creative in its own right and shows no signs of slowing down. He underestimates the potential of this technology and has no clue as to how quickly it will overtake us.

— u/epiphras (105 points · permalink)

This "novel" discovery thing has always been interesting to me. You always hear people talk about how AI can't, more or less, have novel ideas because it is just an algorithm making connections between existing information. But I've always thought, well, how do you think human minds work? We aren't just pulling ideas out of thin air, we are making connections between things we have already learned. I guess I just don't see how human thought is fundamentally different. I feel like people have this weird conception that human thought is somehow magical, when really we are just the universe's most powerful pattern recognition machine (that we know of) and then we transfer that pattern to other systems. Or as he put it, we cross pollinate.

— u/Aggressive_Pope (60 points · permalink)


It's official! Nvidia to acquire Hugging Face for 12.9 billion dollars.

1271 points · 342 comments · r/LocalLLaMA · by u/SarcasticBaka

Nvidia and Hugging Face logos

Nvidia has officially announced its acquisition of Hugging Face for $12.9 billion. Hugging Face CEO Clem noted that Nvidia committed to keeping HF open, independent, and compute-agnostic, with founders and the team staying. The community reaction has been skeptical, with many pointing out that such promises are routinely broken after acquisitions as companies gradually shift toward proprietary strategies.

Interesting Points
  • The deal values Hugging Face at approximately $12.93 billion, making it one of the largest acquisitions in the AI open-source ecosystem.
  • Hugging Face CEO Clem posted on Twitter that Nvidia committed to keeping HF open, independent, and compute agnostic, with founders and team staying.
  • Community members expressed skepticism about post-acquisition promises, citing the pattern of companies commoditizing open-source platforms before gradually restricting access.
  • Some users questioned whether an LLM weights repository is truly worth $13 billion, while others noted Nvidia's strategic rationale in securing the open-source ecosystem.
Top Comments

HF CEO Clem on twitter: "Nvidia committed to keeping HF open, independent and compute agnostic. Founders and team are staying"

Time will tell...

— u/rerri (951 points · permalink)

so an LLM weights repo is worth 13 billions?

— u/skullfuckr42 (199 points · permalink)

Founders and team are staying

Not after few months when everyone cashes out.

— u/xseson23 (375 points · permalink)

Same story in 1 more subreddit: r/artificial

Nvidia buys Hugging Face for $12.9B - End of neutral AI?

65 points · 19 comments · r/artificial · by u/unconventionalbook


My RULE of Thumb of choosing a models

892 points · 194 comments · r/LocalLLaMA · by u/Altruistic_Heat_9531

My RULE of Thumb of choosing a models

A humorous self-post about rules of thumb for choosing AI models, which quickly devolved into a meme thread about human intelligence as a model. The top comments joked about running "homo sapiens" at different configurations and IQ settings, with one commenter noting that Eminem holds the world record for rapping at approximately 10 tokens per second.

Top Comments

homo sapiens runs much slower for me. what's your config? tuning tips?

— u/Y2K-Denial (282 points · permalink)

Sounds like a skill issue—I run myself at IQ1_S and haven't run into any problems problems problem problems problems problem problems problems problems problems problems problems problems problem problems problems problems

— u/MysticChromium64 (274 points · permalink)

Needing to fine-tune homo sapien models for 22 years is kinda rough ngl.

— u/Ink_code (127 points · permalink)


"Welcome to the AGI era," OpenAI says as GPT-6 Astra debuts

698 points · 179 comments · r/singularity · by u/ShreckAndDonkey123

"Welcome to the AGI era," OpenAI says as GPT-6 Astra debuts

A post sharing the Axios article about OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra launch announcement, with Greg Brockman declaring "Welcome to the AGI era." The post generated significant discussion about the staged rollout strategy, with Astra first available only to a limited set of organizations through Daybreak Access before broader availability to subscribers and API developers.

Top Comments

Looks like someone forgot to reschedule the pre-written article.

— u/aditipawarr (411 points · permalink)

GPT-6 Astra will first be available to a limited set of organizations in OpenAI's Daybreak Access program and will be available "in the coming days" for ChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business and Enterprise customers and API developers.

— u/Recoil42 (150 points · permalink)

oh my fucking god do they just jerk off at the thought that they’re even close to like terminator level AI my fucking god just release it to everyone it just spits out text holy shit

— u/domdod9 (128 points · permalink)

Same story in 2 more subreddits: r/ChatGPT, r/singularity

GPT-6 Astra Is Here—And OpenAI Thinks It May Kick Off the AGI Era

537 points · 207 comments · r/ChatGPT · by u/wiredmagazine

OpenAI officially announces GPT-6 Astra

48 points · 9 comments · r/singularity


Astra leaked chat

596 points · 127 comments · r/singularity · by u/VenomCruster

Screenshot of a leaked chat with GPT-6 Astra

A leaked chat conversation with OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra model has been shared on Reddit, providing early insights into the model's capabilities and behavior ahead of its official release.

Interesting Points
  • The leaked chat provides early insights into GPT-6 Astra's capabilities and behavior.
  • The leak occurred ahead of the model's official release, raising questions about OpenAI's security practices.
  • The chat has sparked widespread discussion about the model's capabilities and the implications of the leak.

GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI

583 points · 120 comments · r/OpenAI · by u/MatricesRL

GPT-6 Astra | OpenAI

A post about GPT-6 Astra from OpenAI, sharing information about the new model.

Top Comments

https://preview.redd.it/20fubvj41dnh1.jpeg?width=1206&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fa75dce9ca37df23340ddacf123fe592b87140f2

— u/throwawaysusi (183 points · permalink)

GPT‑6 Astra is rolling out today to a limited set of organizations and over the coming days will become available to all ChatGPT Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise users, as well as through the OpenAI API and AWS.

Big oof. Gotta wait a little longer. Par for the course I guess.

— u/Arbrand (116 points · permalink)

My first profound conversation with AGI

https://preview.redd.it/fc5dqakw0dnh1.jpeg?width=1046&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fa06a928082ac230cff79f343e960516d7b06014

— u/ChemE586 (97 points · permalink)


GPT-6 Astra Launch Video

582 points · 170 comments · r/singularity · by u/ResultBackground2450

GPT-6 Astra Launch Video

A post sharing the GPT-6 Astra launch video that OpenAI published briefly before taking the blog post down. The video featured a relatively mundane demo of ordering chicken via computer use, which many commenters found underwhelming for an AGI-class model announcement.

Top Comments

Only OpenAI does a launch announcement with no launch.

— u/Apollo18Teslaa (229 points · permalink)

I'm insanely excited for the Astra benchmarks, but you could have told me this is an Opus 4.6 launch video and I would have believed you.

I'm using Fable to do months worth of certain kinds of work as a scientist in a day. Astra looks to be even better. And their demo is, "Uh order me some chicken."

— u/Belostoma (118 points · permalink)

This launch is a mess. Where is this video from?

— u/Cosvic (94 points · permalink)


Claude Fable 5.1 surpasses human average on SimpleBench

572 points · 81 comments · r/singularity · by u/Profanion

Claude Fable 5.1 has surpassed the human baseline on SimpleBench, a benchmark designed to test common-sense reasoning with multiple-choice questions involving wordplay, spatial reasoning, and social intelligence. The human baseline was established by averaging scores from nine participants who were native English speakers with at least high school-level mathematical proficiency. The benchmark gives roughly 3 minutes per question and includes trick questions and spatial reasoning tasks.

Interesting Points
  • The human baseline score was 83.7%, established by averaging results from nine test takers who were native English speakers with at least high school-level mathematical proficiency.
  • Each participant attempted a random subsample of 25 questions from the 200+ question pool, ensuring all questions were answered at least once.
  • Participants were given roughly 3 minutes per question and could use pen and paper to visualize.
  • The benchmark includes questions involving wordplay, spatial reasoning (visualization), social intelligence, and trick questions.
  • Some commenters noted that the small sample size of nine humans makes the baseline statistically fragile.
Top Comments

Sorry. Human baseline, not human average.

— u/Profanion (88 points · permalink)

3.2 Human Evaluation

To assess the performance of human participants on SimpleBench, we selected nine individuals to complete the benchmark. Each participant attempted a random subsample of 25 questions, ensuring that all 200+ questions were answered at least once. Participants were chosen based on specific criteria: they were native English speakers with at least a high school level of mathematical proficiency. We did not control for IQ or general reasoning aptitude and acknowledge that selection bias was likely inherent.

The participants were given the following instructions:

Given multiple-choice questions, each with 6 options. Please spend roughly 3 minutes per question, longer if needed. Feel free to use pen and paper to visualize. You will not need to do math beyond middle school level for any question. The questions might involve wordplay, and the correct answer might be phrased in a way you aren’t always used to. A few questions could be called ‘trick’ questions, others test spatial reasoning (visualization) or social intelligence (is this situation normal?), and some will definitely take a bit longer than others. Pick the most realistic (things that are most likely to happen in the real world) option.

The scores from the nine test takers were averaged and reported (83.7%) as the human baseline.

If anyone else was wondering how the human baseline was arrived at

— u/Wulfram77 (77 points · permalink)

The scores from the nine test takers

As a statistician:

gif

— u/Disastrous_Room_927 (133 points · permalink)

Gemini 3.8 Flash and the open weights Muse Spark 1.3 are also pretty much there. Wow!

I remember when this benchmark first came out and the models still scored in the single digits.

— u/FoxBenedict (76 points · permalink)

Guess NotSoSimpleBench will be out soon then

— u/DeArgonaut (43 points · permalink)


Meta's muse spark 1.3 surpassed fable 5 and GPT 5.6 sol 🫡

512 points · 148 comments · r/singularity · by u/Snoo26837

Meta's muse spark 1.3 surpassed fable 5 and GPT 5.6 sol 🫡

Meta's newly released Muse Spark 1.3 model has reportedly surpassed both Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol on benchmark evaluations, marking a significant competitive development in the frontier AI race. Early testers describe the model as highly capable for work tasks, very fast, and significantly cheaper than competitors like Grok 4.6. The release signals Meta's aggressive push into the frontier model space, leveraging its massive infrastructure and developer ecosystem to compete directly with OpenAI, Anthropic, and other leading AI labs.

Interesting Points
  • Early testers describe Muse Spark 1.3 as 'mechanical' but excellent for work tasks, with very fast inference speeds.
  • One tester noted it has '2x the horizon of Grok 4.6 and much cheaper,' calling it a healthy market competitor.
  • The model's pricing strategy is described as intentionally dev-friendly, raising the competitive bar significantly.
  • Commenters noted that Meta appears to have taken a cue from Chinese AI labs by prioritizing practical utility over pure benchmark performance.
  • Some observers questioned whether current benchmarks capture 'intelligence' versus 'wisdom,' suggesting a need for new evaluation frameworks.
Top Comments

Zuck is climbing his way to the top through sheer force of money

— u/New_Alps_5655 (289 points · permalink)

I'm having a hard time believing this. Will test tonight. If this is any where close to real, I love it so god damn much. There is nothing better for consumers than real competition in the market.

— u/NewYak4281 (181 points · permalink)

I think ever since Opus 5 topped Fable 5 on AA, some of these benchmarks are capturing "intelligence" but not "wisdom" (aka "big model smell"). We need to have a new benchmark about wisdom...

— u/FateOfMuffins (95 points · permalink)

How do these companies all hit the same milestones and breakthroughs so close to each other all the time? Wouldn't it make sense for one of them to discover something revolutionary and pull away at some point?

— u/KalElReturns89 (81 points · permalink)

Any guesses to the model size? I hope it's less than 1 trillion parms but it's looking unlikely.

— u/myreala (26 points · permalink)


53 more Reddit stories

Updates: 05:30 AM PDT · 08:30 AM PDT · 11:30 AM PDT · 02:30 PM PDT · 05:30 PM PDT